Exam 33: Antitrust Law and Unfair Trade Practices

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

If two or more firms act the same but no concerted action is shown,can they be held for violation for Section 1 of the Sherman Act?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(24)

A horizontal restraint of trade occurs when two or more competitors at different levels of distribution enter into a contract to restrain trade.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(31)

How do courts determine the line of commerce that will be affected by a merger?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(30)

The three largest cola manufacturers in a country agree among themselves that each one will sell the products only in certain predetermined geographical "territories." This is an example of ________.

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(33)

Which of the following is true of horizontal mergers?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(46)

The rationale behind the ________ is that the right to petition the government has precedence because it is guaranteed by the Bill of Rights.

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(29)

The legality of nonprice vertical restraints of trade under Section 1 of the Sherman Act is examined by applying the ________.

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(34)

Which of the following is a vertical restraint of trade?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(32)

Favorable credit terms and freight charges are examples of indirect price discrimination that violate the Robinson-Patman Act.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(36)

________ is a restraint of trade in which competitors agree that each will serve only a designated portion of the market.

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)

Which of the following is a per se violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(33)

The ________,which was enacted in 1950,widened the scope of Section 7 of the Clayton Act to include asset acquisitions.

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)

Which of the following is a horizontal restraint of trade?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(40)

________ are mergers between firms in totally unrelated businesses.

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(36)

The setting of minimum resale prices is not a per se violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(38)

A merger between two regional fruit-sellers that do not sell fruit in the same geographical area is an example of a ________.

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(30)

Under Section 3 of the Clayton Act,a tying arrangement is lawful if there is some justifiable reason for it.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(32)

Which of the following is true of antitrust laws?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)

Compare and contrast the two rules developed by the U.S.Supreme Court for determining the lawfulness of a restraint under Section 1 of the Sherman Act.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(40)

Antitrust laws are enacted to limit anticompetitive behavior.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(40)
Showing 41 - 60 of 100
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)