Exam 16: Identification Procedures
Explain the following issues related to people who observe showups, lineups, and photographic lineups: actions of police and witnesses while observing the procedure; testimony in court regarding procedure; in-court identification of suspect.
The police interact with the witnesses while taking statements and conducting identification procedures. It is important that the police conduct the procedure fairly and do not try to influence the decision of the witness. Prior to any viewing of people or photographs, the witness must be told that the person who committed the crime may or may not be presented. Care should be taken to avoid giving the witness the impression that the police have determined that the criminal is there. Any form of coach of the witnesses is prohibited. Witnesses must be made to understand that the identification should be based on their memory of the crime and not comments by the police or other people. Witnesses who observed properly conducted identification procedures may testify about them in court. The prosecution may call those who selected the defendant; if someone else was selected, the defense will call the person who made that identification to the stand. The Supreme Court has ruled that witnesses who participated in improperly conducted identification procedures may testify. The Harmless Error Rule will be applied if testimony is given about the improper procedure. They can make an in-court identification of the defendant if they can base that testimony on recollections of the crime scene and not the identification procedure that was inadmissible. The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine will be applied by the appellate court when evaluating this testimony.
Dan called the police and told the 911 operator that a man just stole his wallet and ran east on Main Street. Officer Ewing was immediately dispatched to the location. He saw a man in a warm-up suit running east on Main Street about three blocks from where Dan reported the theft occurred. Officer Ewing transported Fred, the man he saw running, to where Dan was waiting. Dan asked to have Fred turn sideways so he could see his profile. As soon as Fred turned, Dan said, "That's him!" Did having a showup instead of conducting a lineup violate Fred's rights?
C
Dan called the police and told the 911 operator that a man just stole his wallet and ran east on Main Street. Officer Ewing was immediately dispatched to the location. He saw a man in a warm-up suit running east on Main Street about three blocks from where Dan reported the theft occurred. Officer Ewing transported Fred, the man he saw running, to where Dan was waiting. Dan asked to have Fred turn sideways so he could see his profile. As soon as Fred turned, Dan said, "That's him!" Did Officer Ewing have the right to detain Fred for the purpose of having a showup?
A suspect has a Sixth Amendment right to have an attorney present at a showup held prior to an arrest.
What is the lowest level of suspicion that must be present for the police to take a person to the station to participate in a lineup?
Discuss the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights during showups, lineups, and photographic lineups.
A suspect who is not present when the pictures are shown to the witness has the right to have an attorney present during a photographic lineup:
Officer Gray was investigating a case involving a serial rapist. When DNA tests came back from the lab, Officer Gray realized that Hal, who was in the county jail awaiting trial on unrelated charges, was the prime suspect. He looked through booking photos but had trouble finding men who were similar because Hal was 6' 10" tall and weighed 180 pounds. He decided to use four men who were about Hal's age and the same ethnicity as Hal. Officer Gray intentionally did not notify Hal's attorney that the lineup was being conducted. Officer Gray asked jail staff to bring Hal and the four other men to the viewing room. All of them were wearing jail uniforms. Officer Gray then allowed the victims, who had been chatting in the coffee room, to view the lineup. Officer Gray asked each of the men to put on a jacket that was found at the scene of one of the rapes. Hal was the only one who was able to do so; the jacket was much too small for the other men. The victims stood close together, and as soon as one indicated that Hal was the rapist the others agreed. Did the way Officer Gray allowed the victims to view the lineup violate Hal's rights?
A lineup is a procedure where an eyewitness is allowed to view several people and is then asked if the person who committed the crime is in the group.
A witness can testify about selecting a person at a lineup only if he/she selected the defendant who is currently on trial.
What is the lowest level of suspicion that must be present for the police to include a person's picture in a photographic lineup?
A suspect can invoke his/her Fifth Amendment rights as grounds to refuse to give a voice exemplar during a lineup.
A suspect can be taken to the police station for a lineup if the police have probable cause to arrest that person.
The police have the right to stop any individual on the street and take him/her to the station to participate in a lineup.
Officer Gray was investigating a case involving a serial rapist. When DNA tests came back from the lab, Officer Gray realized that Hal, who was in the county jail awaiting trial on unrelated charges, was the prime suspect. He looked through booking photos but had trouble finding men who were similar because Hal was 6' 10" tall and weighed 180 pounds. He decided to use four men who were about Hal's age and the same ethnicity as Hal. Officer Gray intentionally did not notify Hal's attorney that the lineup was being conducted. Officer Gray asked jail staff to bring Hal and the four other men to the viewing room. All of them were wearing jail uniforms. Officer Gray then allowed the victims, who had been chatting in the coffee room, to view the lineup. Officer Gray asked each of the men to put on a jacket that was found at the scene of one of the rapes. Hal was the only one who was able to do so; the jacket was much too small for the other men. The victims stood close together, and as soon as one indicated that Hal was the rapist the others agreed. Did having Hal put on the jacket violate his rights?
Jack was on trial for the murder of Kim's husband. Kim, who was present when her husband was shot, testified at the trial: Prosecutor: Were you present when your husband was shot? Kim: Yes, I was about three feet from him. I'll never forget it. Prosecutor: Do you think you can identify the person who shot your husband? Kim: Yes, he's sitting over there, at the table with the sign that says Defense. Prosecutor: Are you positive? Now I know you picked him out of a lineup, but the judge has ruled that the lineup was not conducted properly. So I just want to make sure you are not thinking about the lineup. Kim: Oh, I know it's him. At the lineup I looked at his face and I was sure he was the man I saw shoot my husband. But I just noticed that tattoo on his neck. I've never seen a tattoo like that except the one on the man who was shooting my husband. So I'm sure it was him. Can Jack's defense attorney call a psychologist as an expert witness to testify about the fallacy of eye-witness identifications?
A showup is a procedure where an eyewitness is shown the picture of a suspect prior to making an arrest.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)