Exam 11: Conduct Invalidating Assent
Exam 1: Introduction to Law76 Questions
Exam 2: Business Ethics64 Questions
Exam 3: Civil Dispute Resolution104 Questions
Exam 4: Constitutional Law106 Questions
Exam 5: Administrative Law79 Questions
Exam 6: Criminal Law88 Questions
Exam 7: Intentional Torts101 Questions
Exam 8: Negligence and Strict Liability103 Questions
Exam 9: Introduction to Contracts75 Questions
Exam 10: Mutual Assent93 Questions
Exam 11: Conduct Invalidating Assent82 Questions
Exam 12: Consideration83 Questions
Exam 13: Illegal Bargains67 Questions
Exam 14: Contractual Capacity74 Questions
Exam 15: Contracts in Writing81 Questions
Exam 16: Third Parties to Contracts86 Questions
Exam 17: Performance Breach and Discharge72 Questions
Exam 18: Contract Remedies74 Questions
Exam 19: Introduction to Sales and Leases67 Questions
Exam 20: Performance63 Questions
Exam 21: Transfer of Title and Risk of Loss70 Questions
Exam 22: Product Liability Warranties and Strict Liability73 Questions
Exam 23: Sales Remedies74 Questions
Exam 24: Form and Content67 Questions
Exam 25: Transfer and Holder in Due Course72 Questions
Exam 26: Liability of Parties71 Questions
Exam 27: Bank Deposits Collections and Funds Transfers64 Questions
Exam 28: Relationship of Principal and Agent82 Questions
Exam 29: Relationship With Third Parties82 Questions
Exam 30: Formation and Internal Relations of General Partnerships71 Questions
Exam 31: Operation and Dissolution of General Partnerships68 Questions
Exam 32: Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies70 Questions
Exam 33: Nature and Formation of Corporations81 Questions
Exam 34: Financial Structure of Corporations81 Questions
Exam 35: Management Structure of Corporations103 Questions
Exam 36: Fundamental Changes of Corporations78 Questions
Exam 37: Secured Transactions and Suretyship81 Questions
Exam 38: Bankruptcy97 Questions
Exam 39: Securities Regulation93 Questions
Exam 40: Intellectual Property83 Questions
Exam 41: Employment Law97 Questions
Exam 42: Antitrust83 Questions
Exam 43: Accountants Legal Liability69 Questions
Exam 44: Consumer Protection88 Questions
Exam 45: Environmental Law77 Questions
Exam 46: International Business Law85 Questions
Exam 47: Introduction to Property Property Insurance Bailments and Documents of Title82 Questions
Exam 48: Interests in Real Property81 Questions
Exam 49: Transfer and Control of Real Property88 Questions
Exam 50: Trusts and Wills77 Questions
Select questions type
Economic coercion that compels a person to enter into a contract renders that contract void.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(36)
Sam wants to sell his golden retriever to Al. Sam tells Al that the dog is three years old and that he will point, back, and retrieve. Al relies on these statements and purchases the bird dog. Although the dog is three years old and will point at birds, he will not back (honor another dog's point). The buyer has most probably been a victim of:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(29)
Al owns a farm that he believes is worth $150,000. Betty knows that there is oil under the farm and offers Al $160,000 for it. Al is suspicious and asks her why she wants to buy the place. She says she would like to live in the country. Al then asks her if she thinks there might be valuable minerals under the land. Betty laughs and says she doubts that very much, so Al sells her the farm for $160,000. Al later realizes that the land was worth more than he was paid. Al can have the contract voided based upon fraud.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(31)
a. What are the two types of duress and what is the effect of each on the contract involved?
b. Give an example of each type of duress.
c. Who does the law intend to protect by reason of the defense of duress? Why does the law protect this type of person?
(Essay)
4.8/5
(43)
Acts constituting duress are necessarily crimes or torts in themselves.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(33)
Marcus is a salesman for Outdoor Life. He is telling a potential customer the virtues of a particular tent, by making the claim that "It's tougher than bears!" If this customer buys the tent, only to find it destroyed by bears in the campground,
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(39)
Define undue influence and name some of the relationships that would be affected.
(Essay)
5.0/5
(42)
In the Berardi v. Meadowbrook Mall Company case, the court found:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(32)
The Third Restatement of Torts: Liability for Economic Harm provides that a false statement of opinion results in liability only if (1) the parties are in a fiduciary or confidential relationship or (2) the perpetrator of the fraud holds himself out as having expertise or other knowledge not accessible to the defrauded party.
(True/False)
5.0/5
(37)
The law requires that to form a valid contract the agreement must be voluntary and knowing.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(32)
Pat told her friends that her car got 35 miles to the gallon in the city when in reality it only got 20 miles per gallon. When Pat decides to sell and one these friends decides to buy the car, Pat is under no duty to tell the correct figure unless asked.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(36)
The test for duress is objective and the act constituting duress must be a tort or a crime in order to be wrongful.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(43)
Scienter is the element of fraud that requires that the misrepresentation must have been known by the one making it to be false and must have been made with an intent to deceive.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(41)
A basic element of fraud is a false representation or a misrepresentation.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(29)
For rescission to be available as a remedy for a false statement, a misrepresentation must have been made with scienter.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(30)
A contract was made for 125 bales of cotton to arrive on a ship named "Peerless" from Bombay. Unbeknownst to either party to the contract, there were two ships named "Peerless," both of which were sailing from Bombay. One sailed in October and the other in December. The buyer had in mind the ship sailing in October, but the seller had in mind the ship sailing in December. Each party held his belief in good faith. When the goods failed to arrive on time, the buyer sued for breach of contract. The court found:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)
Sadie convinced Brenda to buy her gas station for $300,000 by stating that she had paid $250,000 for it ten years earlier and that her net average annual profit from the business has been $80,000. In reality she paid $100,000 for the gas station and it has earned a net average annual profit of only $40,000. Brenda made no attempt to verify the statements until after the transaction was completed. In this case:
(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(33)
Showing 21 - 40 of 82
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)