Exam 17: Performance Breach and Discharge

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

Fred contracts to sell a certain tract of land to Mary for $20,000, but the contract is silent as to the time of delivery of the deed and payment of the price. In this case:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(40)

Which of the following is true with respect to substantial performance?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(33)

a. List and summarize the situations where a contract is discharged by agreement of the parties. b. List and summarize the situations where a contract is discharged by operation of law.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(41)

The Code greatly alters the common law doctrine of material breach by adopting what is known as the:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)

A contract may condition the performance of a party upon the approval of a third party.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(41)

Ashley contracted to perform on her horse, Coronation, in the opening ceremonies of the World Equestrian Games. If, before the event, Coronation pulls a tendon in its leg and Ashley has to cancel her appearance, this is a case of:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(35)

Explain what may constitute a material breach and list the several basic principles that must be applied to determine if a material breach exists in a given contract.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(32)

All contractual promises are absolute promises to perform.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(40)

By agreement, parties to a contract may discharge each other from performance under a contract.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(36)

Rebecca sees a pair of beautiful silver shoes in a store window. She goes in and tells the shopkeeper, "If I am asked to the prom, I will buy those shoes. Please hold them for me." If the shopkeeper signs a note that says, "Will hold for Rebecca silver shoes, style 1028, size 8," will he have to honor that promise?

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(38)

The Restatement and the Code have made the traditional test of objective impossibility more stringent by requiring that the performance must be actually or literally impossible in order to excuse a party from contractual duties.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(36)

Al owes Tracy $500, due June 1. Al, Tracy, and Ted mutually agree that Ted will pay Tracy instead of paying Al the money Ted owes Al. Such an agreement is an example of:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(30)

In the case of Hochster v. De La Tour the plaintiff was allowed to treat the repudiation by De La Tour as breach of contract and immediately bring suit.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(37)

Belinda has a household insurance policy, which requires that she notify the insurance company within 30 days of any loss before she is eligible to receive payment for her loss. The notification requirement is a condition precedent to the insurance company's obligation to perform, even though the notification must occur subsequent to the loss.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(42)

If the performance of a contract that was legal when formed becomes illegal because of a subsequently enacted law, the duty of performance is discharged.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(45)

Daniel, a cabinetmaker, contracts to make a china cabinet to Lora's satisfaction and Lora promises to pay Daniel $2,800 for the cabinet if she is satisfied with it when completed. Daniel completes the cabinet in a workmanlike manner using the wood Lora has chosen. If Lora tells Daniel that she is not satisfied with the cabinet and refuses to accept or pay for it, Daniel is entitled to recover from Lora the reasonable value of the cabinet if her dissatisfaction is unreasonable.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(32)

Implied-in-fact conditions must fully and literally occur, and they are understood by the parties to be part of the agreement.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(31)

Steven owes Theresa $100 for a used computer which he bought last year at Theresa's garage sale. The two agree that the debt can be paid by Steven's shoveling Theresa's driveway from January through March. The new contract is a(n):

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(32)

The principle illustrated in the Christy v. Pilkinton case is:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(37)

Unless one of the parties contractually assumes the risk, the __________ discharges a contract if supervening circumstances make fulfillment of the purpose which both parties had in mind impossible.

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(50)
Showing 41 - 60 of 72
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)