Exam 13: Negligence: Element III: Proximate Cause

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags
Match the following
Premises:
few or no assets
Responses:
actual cause
intervening cause
thin-skull rule
Correct Answer:
Verified
Premises:
Responses:
few or no assets
actual cause
(Matching)
5.0/5
(27)
Match the following
Premises:
high vulnerability to injury
Responses:
thin-skull rule
proximate cause
duty to mitigate damages
Correct Answer:
Verified
Premises:
Responses:
high vulnerability to injury
thin-skull rule
(Matching)
4.7/5
(33)

Explain why it is not true that you will be liable for every injury of which you are the actual cause.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(39)

The two components of proximate cause are actual cause and legal cause.

(True/False)
5.0/5
(32)

The defendant will not be liable for the aggravation of the original injury caused by the defendant when the plaintiff could have prevented the aggravation.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(38)

What is the legal cause component of proximate cause?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(30)

The extent of the injury must be foreseeable for the defendant to be the proximate cause of that injury.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(35)

Intervening forces are always superseding causes.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(36)

What are some of the commonsense considerations for determining whether something is the actual cause of an injury?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(45)
Match the following
Premises:
a new or independent force that produces harm after the defendant's act or omission
Responses:
actual cause
duty to mitigate damages
highly extraordinary
Correct Answer:
Verified
Premises:
Responses:
a new or independent force that produces harm after the defendant's act or omission
actual cause
(Matching)
4.9/5
(31)

Distinguish between general causation and specific causation in toxic tort cases.

(Essay)
4.7/5
(36)

A sudden violent storm that contributes to the plaintiff's injury is an intervening ________.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(34)
Match the following
Premises:
medical problem prior to the defendant's wrong
Responses:
superseding cause
preexisting condition
judgment proof
Correct Answer:
Verified
Premises:
Responses:
medical problem prior to the defendant's wrong
superseding cause
(Matching)
4.7/5
(35)
Showing 21 - 33 of 33
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)