Exam 6: Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement

The scope of a consent search is limited to the terms of the consent.

Which of the following cases developed the armspan rule?

Third-party individuals can always give consent.

In Safford United School District No. 1 v. Redding (2009), the Supreme Court held that although an assistant principal had reasonable suspicion a student was giving away contraband, reasonable suspicion did not justify

All schoolchildren can be randomly drug tested.

An automobile is a recognizable exigency to the courts.

Children can give consent to have their parents' property searched.

27 Consent search may be valid even if the consenting party is unaware of the fact that he or she can refuse consent.

In Pennsylvania v. Mimms (1977), police officers stopped Mimms because of an expired plate. When Mimms stepped out of the car, the officers noticed a bulge in the pocket of Mimms's jacket indicative of a

Warrantless entry of private premises by police officers is valid if based on the apparent authority doctrine.

Whether a vehicle is mobile is a factor used in determining if it qualifies for the automobile exception.

Border checkpoints are justified

The landmark case Terry decided that a frisk is permissible only when an officer

Warrantless searches of schoolchildren are permissible.

The automobile exception is based upon the justification that the

In which of the following circumstances would the police most likely not be able to use the automobile exception to the warrant requirement?

Which court case allowed police officers the freedom to conduct broad searches?

A third party can consent to a search

Persons can be detained for

Spouses can consent to have their partner's property searched.