Exam 6: Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement

In Delaware v. Prouse (1979), the Supreme Court held that law enforcement officials cannot randomly stop drivers for the purpose of checking

The Supreme Court has allowed drug testing of employees for deterrence purposes.

If a person refuses to consent to a search, that refusal should be looked upon as an indication of guilt.

New Jersey v. T.L.O. deals with drug testing of schoolchildren.

A stop and frisk originated in Mapp v. Ohio.

Probable cause is required for an investigative detention.

In which of the following situations would a police officer not need a search warrant to conduct a search?

A frisk must

For the police to bring a suspect to the stationhouse for detention, the police must

The armspan rule limits a search

Describe when the automobile exception applies and what the police must do to search an automobile.

Consent is valid even if it is expressed or implied.

In which of the following situations would a police officer not be able to act without a warrant due to exigent circumstances?

Evidence seized by parole officers during an illegal search and seizure need not be excluded at a parole revocation hearing.

Which one of the following is not permissible for stationhouse detentions for the purpose of fingerprinting?

The term "evanescent" when describing certain evidence stands for

What are the various exigencies to the warrant requirement, and when do they apply?

Third-party consent can be given if the third party does not possess common authority over the area to be searched and the non-consenting party is present.

Which of the following does not constitute a warrantless action based on the hot pursuit exigency?

In Terry v. Ohio, the Court