Exam 8: Criterion-Related Validation
Exam 1: Introduction and Overview14 Questions
Exam 2: Statistics Review for PSYC Measurement14 Questions
Exam 3: Sychological Scaling14 Questions
Exam 4: Test Preparation and Specification15 Questions
Exam 5: Reliability Overview: Classical Test Theory15 Questions
Exam 6: Estimating Reliability14 Questions
Exam 7: Content Validation15 Questions
Exam 8: Criterion-Related Validation15 Questions
Exam 9: Construct Validation15 Questions
Exam 10: VG Psychometric Meta-Analysis Copy15 Questions
Exam 11: Tests Bias Unfairness and Equivalence15 Questions
Exam 12: Developing Tests of Maximal Performance15 Questions
Exam 13: Classical Test Theory Item Analysis15 Questions
Exam 14: Scoring Tests15 Questions
Exam 15: Developing Measures of Typical Performance15 Questions
Exam 16: Response Biases15 Questions
Exam 17: Multiple Regression15 Questions
Exam 18: Exploratory Factor Analysis15 Questions
Exam 19: Confirmatory Factor Analysis15 Questions
Exam 20: Item Response Theory15 Questions
Exam 21: Applications of Item Response Theory: Computer Adaptive Testing and Differential Item Functioning15 Questions
Exam 22: Generalizability Theory14 Questions
Select questions type
To improve prediction over random selection, the validity coefficient must be at least of ________ magnitude.
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(36)
Correct Answer:
B
Using Cohen's (1988) guidelines to evaluate the magnitude of correlation-based effect sizes, an obtained criterion-related validity coefficient of .52 would be considered ________.
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)
Correct Answer:
D
Consider a scenario in which a highly selective school wanted to improve its selection of prospective students. A consultant developed a new predictor with an internal consistency reliability of .75. The consultant then correlated the new measure with a criterion of student success, and found that the resulting correlation was .39. Prior to reporting the results, the consultant considered whether corrections for attenuation due to unreliability should be performed in the predictor, the criterion, neither, or both. Provide a recommendation explaining how the consultant should proceed.
Free
(Essay)
4.9/5
(31)
Correct Answer:
It would be appropriate to correct for attenuation due to unreliability only for the criterion. Given the criterion is less than perfectly reliable, the observed criterion-related validity estimate has been attenuated. Since the criterion is not the measure being examined for selection purposes, it is appropriate to correct for the less than perfect reliability in that measure. However, it would not be appropriate to correct for attenuation due to unreliability in the newly developed predictor, since that error will be present in the actual use of the test.
The correction of artifacts impacting the predictor in a criterion-related validity study would likely ________ the estimate of criterion-related validity.
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(38)
________ criterion-related validation designs typically provide the greatest freedom in obtaining samples.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(30)
________ criterion-related validation designs require considerably more time before drawing a conclusion about the experimental measure.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(33)
A small organization which has too few employees to conduct a full-scale criterion-related validation study may wish to employ the use of ________ validity.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(38)
(a) Explain why restriction in range in a predictor can be an issue for demonstrating criterion-related validity.
(b) What is the biggest challenge in mathematically correcting for the problem of restriction in range?
(Essay)
4.9/5
(37)
Roth et al. (2017) found that the use of job incumbent samples to estimate the amount of variability in predictor scores in the population results in an ________ of the true criterion-related validity.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(38)
In a ________ criterion-related validation study, scores on a criterion of interest are collected prior to obtaining test scores.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(37)
(a) Identify one advantage of utilizing a concurrent or postdictive criterion-related validation designs compared to predictive criterion-related studies.
(b) Identify two disadvantages of utilizing a concurrent or postdictive criterion-related validation study compared to predictive criterion-related studies.
(Essay)
4.8/5
(37)
_______ percent of the variance in a criterion would remain unexplained if the criterion-related validity of a test was found to be .30.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)
Criterion-related validation studies require sufficiently large sample sizes.
(a) What common research concerns might lead you to doubt the results of a criterion-related validation study that utilized a small sample?
(b) What minimal size sample was suggested by Schmidt, Hunter and Urry (1976) for conducting criterion-related validation studies?
(Essay)
4.8/5
(41)
Explain why the choice of a criterion is crucial to criterion-related validation.
(Essay)
4.7/5
(27)
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)