Exam 15: Evolutionary Perspectives
Evolutionary psychologists often propose that the human mind is like a Swiss Army knife,with a variety of specific adaptations that are each the product of selection pressures from specific environmental problems.Is this a parsimonious viewpoint? Why or why not?
The viewpoint that the human mind is like a Swiss Army knife, with specific adaptations for different environmental problems, can be considered parsimonious to some extent. This is because it suggests that the human mind has evolved to efficiently solve a variety of specific problems, rather than being a general-purpose cognitive system.
However, some may argue that this viewpoint is not entirely parsimonious because it implies that the human mind has a large number of specific adaptations, each tailored to a particular environmental problem. This could be seen as overly complex and not the simplest explanation for the diversity of human cognitive abilities.
Additionally, the Swiss Army knife analogy may oversimplify the complexity of the human mind and the interactions between different cognitive adaptations. It may not fully capture the dynamic and interconnected nature of human cognition.
Overall, while the Swiss Army knife analogy provides a useful framework for understanding the diversity of human cognitive abilities, it may not be entirely parsimonious in its explanation of the evolution of the human mind.
What is the difference between homology and homoplasy? Provide an example of each.
Homology and homoplasy are two concepts in evolutionary biology that describe the relationships between characteristics in different species. Understanding these concepts is crucial for reconstructing the evolutionary history of organisms.
**Homology** refers to traits that are similar between different species due to shared ancestry. Homologous structures or genes are inherited from a common ancestor and can be traced back to that point in the evolutionary tree where the divergence occurred. These structures may serve different functions in the present-day species, but their similarity arises from a common origin.
*Example of Homology*: The forelimbs of mammals are a classic example of homology. The bones in the human hand, the wing of a bat, the flipper of a whale, and the leg of a dog are structurally similar and share a common ancestral limb. Despite their different functions—grasping, flying, swimming, and walking, respectively—they are considered homologous because they evolved from the same ancestral structure.
**Homoplasy** refers to traits that are similar between different species, not because of shared ancestry, but due to convergent evolution or evolutionary reversals. In convergent evolution, unrelated species independently evolve similar traits as a result of having to adapt to similar environments or ecological niches. Evolutionary reversals occur when a species re-evolves a characteristic that had been lost in its lineage. Homoplastic traits arise from similar selective pressures rather than from a common ancestor.
*Example of Homoplasy*: The wings of birds and insects are an example of homoplasy. Although both serve the function of flight, bird wings evolved from forelimbs of their dinosaur ancestors, while insect wings have a completely different origin. The similarity in function is due to convergent evolution, where different organisms independently evolved wings to adapt to the ability to fly.
In summary, homology is about common ancestry and shared evolutionary history, while homoplasy is about similar traits arising independently due to similar selective pressures or environmental conditions. Understanding the distinction between these two concepts is essential for accurately interpreting the evolutionary relationships among organisms.
A linguist might study the historical relationship between languages by using a comparative method to construct a family tree.For instance,the tree might show that Spanish and French are both descendants of Latin.How is this similar to comparative neuroscience? Draw an analogy between the two.
The study of the historical relationship between languages through the comparative method is analogous to the field of comparative neuroscience in several ways. Both disciplines involve the comparison of different entities to understand their origins, development, and the relationships between them.
In linguistics, a scholar might examine various languages to identify commonalities and differences in vocabulary, grammar, and syntax. By doing so, they can trace back the evolution of languages and construct a family tree that illustrates how different languages are related. For example, by comparing Spanish and French, a linguist can determine that both languages have evolved from Latin, and they can map out the changes that occurred over time as these languages diverged from their common ancestor.
Comparative neuroscience operates on a similar principle but focuses on the comparison of nervous systems across different species. Neuroscientists study the structure, function, and evolution of the brain and nervous systems to understand how they have changed over time and what these changes can tell us about the relationships between species.
Drawing an analogy between the two:
1. **Family Tree vs. Evolutionary Tree**: Just as a linguist constructs a family tree to show the relationship between languages, comparative neuroscientists construct an evolutionary tree (phylogenetic tree) to illustrate the relationships between different species based on their nervous systems. Both trees represent a branching pattern of descent from common ancestors.
2. **Shared Ancestry**: In linguistics, languages that share a common ancestor, such as Spanish and French with Latin, are known as sister languages. Similarly, in neuroscience, species that share a common ancestor and have similar neurological features are considered to be closely related. For instance, humans and chimpanzees share a recent common ancestor and have many similarities in their brain structure and function.
3. **Divergence and Adaptation**: The way languages evolve and change over time, incorporating new words and grammatical structures or changing pronunciation, can be likened to how species' nervous systems evolve. Changes in the nervous system may occur due to genetic mutations, natural selection, and adaptation to different environments or lifestyles, just as languages change due to cultural shifts, migrations, and contact with other language speakers.
4. **Reconstructing History**: Linguists use the comparative method to reconstruct proto-languages, hypothetical ancestral languages from which current languages descended. Comparative neuroscientists similarly attempt to reconstruct the nervous system features of common ancestors by comparing the brains of living species, inferring how these systems might have looked in the past.
5. **Methodology**: Both fields use systematic comparisons to draw conclusions about their respective subjects. In linguistics, this might involve comparing word lists or grammatical structures, while in neuroscience, it might involve comparing brain anatomy, neural circuits, or genetic markers.
In summary, comparative neuroscience is similar to the comparative method in linguistics in that both seek to understand the origins and relationships of their subjects by comparing current examples and reconstructing their historical development. Both fields rely on the identification of shared characteristics and the mapping of changes over time to elucidate how complex systems—languages in one case, nervous systems in the other—have diverged from common ancestors.
Taking an evolutionary perspective into account will probably influence the way future studies in cognitive neuroscience are designed in all of the following ways EXCEPT
This key concept in Darwin's theory of evolution is the idea that traits that give members of a species increased chances for reproduction will be more heavily represented in subsequent generations.
The retention of a structure,behavior,or gene from a common ancestor is
According to François Jacob (1977),natural selection works like a
What is the difference between an adaptation and an exaptation?
As a predator evolves structures or behaviors that increase its ability to hunt,its prey may also undergo evolution to counter these developments.This is an example of
Imagine that you are presented with four cards labeled D,F,3,and 5,respectively,and are asked to test the following rule: "If there is a D on one side of the card,then there is a 3 on the other side." Which cards must you turn over to determine if the statement is true?
Which of the following was NOT one of Charles Darwin's observations?
In his book,________,________ argued for the gene-centered rather than the organism-centered view of evolution.
Which of the following is NOT one of Bullock's (1984)three major aims for comparative neuroscience?
As a general rule,traits that can be found across a large number of species
Traits have no absolute value;rather,their value is measured by how well they contribute to fitness in a particular environment.
Natural selection acts on variations of the phenotype within the population.
Homoplasy is the retention of a structure,behavior,or gene from a common ancestor.
The bat has evolved a specialized detection system that helps it hunt its prey,the noctuid moth.In tandem,the moth has evolved specialized sensory receptors that allow this species to foil the detection system of the bat.This is an example of
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)