Exam 5: Encounter
Exam 1: How Patterns of Thinking Can Obstruct Justice15 Questions
Exam 2: The Development of a New Pattern of Thinking12 Questions
Exam 3: Justice That Promotes Healing15 Questions
Exam 4: Inclusion10 Questions
Exam 5: Encounter10 Questions
Exam 6: Repair14 Questions
Exam 7: Cohesion15 Questions
Exam 8: Toward a Restorative System10 Questions
Exam 9: Shifting to a Restorative Paradigm10 Questions
Exam 10: Transformation10 Questions
Select questions type
Because those who have been harmed are in a different moral position from those who have caused the harm, encounter process facilitators:
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)
Correct Answer:
B
According to the text, although victims should only engage in encounter programs voluntarily, it's okay to use coercive incentives to get offenders to participate.
Free
(True/False)
4.9/5
(31)
Correct Answer:
False
A family group conference could have a dozen or more people in attendance, including the arresting police officer and other criminal justice representatives.
Free
(True/False)
4.7/5
(31)
Correct Answer:
True
After a circle process has produced a plan by consensus of the whole circle, follow-up circles may be organized to monitor progress.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(41)
The advantages of circle processes over typical criminal justice proceedings include that lay participation is encouraged, the amount and quality of information is greatly increased, and creative new options for sentencing can be explored.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(38)
An encounter allows the person harmed and the person harming to:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(31)
Research on drunk driving panels has shown a dramatic change in the attitudes of offenders and in the likelihood of recidivism.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(34)
The first use of a restorative encounter in America took place in:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)