Exam 12: School Desegregation

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
  • Select Tags

The U.S. Supreme Court held that "separate but equal" was not illegal in Plessy v. Ferguson.

Free
(True/False)
4.7/5
(35)
Correct Answer:
Verified

True

Discuss the Freeman v. Pitts case and its significance in addressing Unitary Status. (page 345)

Free
(Essay)
4.6/5
(26)
Correct Answer:
Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

The Freeman v. Pitts case was a significant Supreme Court case in addressing Unitary Status. In this case, the Court ruled that school districts could be released from federal court supervision even if they had not fully eliminated the effects of past discrimination. This decision allowed school districts to be considered "unitary," or no longer segregated, even if there were still some lingering effects of past discrimination.

The significance of this case lies in the fact that it provided a framework for determining when a school district could be considered unitary and therefore released from federal court supervision. It recognized that complete eradication of the effects of past discrimination may not always be possible, but that substantial progress towards desegregation and equality could still warrant release from supervision.

This case set a precedent for the legal standards and considerations in addressing unitary status, providing guidance for future cases and allowing for a more nuanced approach to the issue of desegregation in schools. It also highlighted the ongoing and complex nature of addressing the legacy of segregation and discrimination in education.

Unitary status occurs when:

Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)
Correct Answer:
Verified

A

Busing has been:

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(39)

Discuss the impact of Green v. Board of Education on freedom of choice issues.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(34)

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Brown II that:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(28)

What element below is associated with de jure segregation?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)

Provide an overview of the desegregation movement in the United States. In your response, discuss the following: a. De Facto Segregation b. De Jure Segregation c. Implications of the Brown Case d. Unitary Status e. Busing and quotas

(Essay)
4.9/5
(42)

The courts can mandate a remedy for de jure segregation but not for de facto segregation.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(29)

Discuss the Freedom of Choice concept and the courts' reaction to such plans.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(29)

The issue of faculty desegregation surfaced in:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(29)

De facto segregation occurs through action taken by a school district to encourage segregation.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(24)

Unitary status may be achieved when school districts have made a good faith effort to achieve desegregation. Short

(True/False)
4.7/5
(37)

The Swann case was a leading case in defining the scope of duty to eliminate de facto segregation.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(27)

The landmark Brown v. Board of Education case was pivotal in:

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(34)

A student assignment plan is acceptable by the courts if it appears to be neutral in school desegregation cases.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(40)

Racial segregation in public schools was held to be unconstitutional in 1954.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(32)

Which of the following was not considered a useful tool in alleviating segregated schools:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(32)

Racial segregation sanctioned by law persisted in the United States until:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(28)

The Brown II decision was made to ensure proper implementation of Brown I.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(30)
Showing 1 - 20 of 36
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)