Exam 5: Alternatives to Experimental Research in Social Psychology

Correct Answer:

Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

Nonexperimental studies in social psychology can pose unique problems for researchers. Some of these problems include:

1) Lack of control over variables: In nonexperimental studies, researchers do not have control over the independent variables, which can lead to confounding variables and make it difficult to establish cause-and-effect relationships. This lack of control can also make it challenging to replicate the study and generalize the findings to other situations.

2) Difficulty establishing causality: Without the ability to manipulate the independent variable, it is difficult to establish a causal relationship between the independent and dependent variables. This can make it challenging to draw meaningful conclusions about the relationships between variables in nonexperimental studies.

3) Potential for bias and confounding variables: Nonexperimental studies are more susceptible to bias and the influence of confounding variables, which can make it difficult to accurately measure the effects of the independent variable on the dependent variable. This can lead to less reliable and valid results compared to true experimental studies.

In conclusion, nonexperimental studies in social psychology present unique challenges related to the lack of control over variables, difficulty establishing causality, and the potential for bias and confounding variables. Researchers must carefully consider these limitations when designing and interpreting nonexperimental studies in order to draw accurate and meaningful conclusions.

Correct Answer:

Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

Pennebaker and Harber's (1993) research on social responses following the Loma Prieta earthquake utilized a nonexperimental research design. This means that the researchers did not manipulate any variables or control for any factors, but rather observed and recorded the natural social responses of individuals following the earthquake.

Despite being nonexperimental, the research did have some qualities usually associated with experimental research. For example, the researchers collected and analyzed data using systematic and rigorous methods. They also used statistical analyses to draw conclusions and make inferences about the social responses to the earthquake. Additionally, the study had a control group (individuals who were not directly affected by the earthquake) and an experimental group (individuals who were directly affected by the earthquake), which allowed for comparisons to be made between the two groups. These qualities demonstrate a level of scientific rigor and control that is typically associated with experimental research, even though the study itself was nonexperimental.