Exam 14: Syllogistic Logic

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
  • Select Tags

Sorites. Translate the following sorites into standard form and test for validity: -There are dogs that are cats. There are no cats that are nonfelines. All monkeys are nonfelines. / / \therefore There are dogs that aren't monkeys.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(43)

Multiple choice: Assume existential import -The proposition "Some nonscientists are nonphilosophers" is equivalent to:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(39)

Multiple choice: Assume existential import -The proposition "All scientists are philosophers" entails:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)

True-False -"All scientists are philosophers" and "No scientists are philosophers" are contradictories.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(44)

Inference: Answer the following questions, not assuming existential import -Suppose it is false that "No logicians are mathematicians." Then what can be said about the truth value of the following sentences? a. Some logicians are not mathematicians b. Some logicians are mathematicians c. All logicians are mathematicians d. All logicians are nonmathematicians e. All mathematicians are nonlogicians f. No mathematicians are logicians g. Some mathematicians are logicians h. Some logicians are nonmathematicians

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(43)

Syllogisms Put the following into standard syllogistic form and test for validity, using either the five rules for valid syllogism or Venn diagrams: -Due to the fact that logicians are brilliant but scientists are not brilliant, some scientists are nonlogicians.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(47)

Syllogisms Put the following into standard syllogistic form and test for validity, using either the five rules for valid syllogism or Venn diagrams: -All logicians live in the United States, but some philosophers dwell elsewhere; so some philosophers are nonlogicians.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(34)

True-False -The subject term of "Some scientists are philosophers" is not distributed.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(42)

Sorites. Translate the following sorites into standard form and test for validity: -No teachers are good teachers. Art is a logician. No one who is not a good teacher is a logician. / / \therefore Art is not a teacher.

(Short Answer)
5.0/5
(41)

General Theory -a. If we interpret the sentence "All scientists are philosophers" so that it is correctly symbolized by General Theory -a.  If we interpret the sentence All scientists are philosophers so that it is correctly symbolized by   , then why will All scientists are philosophers not imply Some scientists are philosophers?  b.	If we interpret “All scientists are philosophers” so that it has existential import, then does “All scientists are philosophers” imply “Some scientists are philosophers” or not? (Defend your answer.) , then why will "All scientists are philosophers" not imply "Some scientists are philosophers"? b. If we interpret “All scientists are philosophers” so that it has existential import, then does “All scientists are philosophers” imply “Some scientists are philosophers” or not? (Defend your answer.)

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(43)

Syllogisms Put the following into standard syllogistic form and test for validity, using either the five rules for valid syllogism or Venn diagrams: -It follows from the fact that no mathematicians are logicians that Art is not a mathematician, since Art is a logician.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(35)

Inference: Answer the following questions, not assuming existential import -Suppose it is false that "Some logicians are mathematicians." Then what can be said about the truth value of the following sentences? a. Some logicians are not mathematicians b. No logicians are mathematicians c. All logicians are mathematicians d. All logicians are nonmathematicians e. All mathematicians are nonlogicians f. No mathematicians are logicians g. Some mathematicians are logicians h. Some mathematicians are not nonlogicians

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(39)
Showing 21 - 32 of 32
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)