Exam 10: Where the Exclusionary Rule Does Not Apply
____________ cases occur when an officer, who is where he or she has a right to be, sees contraband or evidence of a crime.
A
There are two requirements for the admissibility of evidence obtained in a consent search.Discuss these two requirements in detail.
Proof that consent was given voluntarily: Law officers must prove that consent to enter premises or consent to search a person was given voluntarily and was not the product of duress or coercion.Whether consent is voluntary is a question of fact to be determined by the totality of the circumstances.Factors to be considered under this test are the age of the person giving consent (very young or very old); the vulnerability of that person based on mental impairment, lack of education, intoxication, or other similar causes; and the use of threats, promises, deception, or trickery to obtain consent.Courts have held that consent is not necessarily rendered involuntary under the following circumstances:
-The person is not advised of the right to refuse to give consent.This advice is not required, but some officers give it.
-Consent is given by a handcuffed person while officers had their weapons drawn.
-Consent is given while a person was under the influence of drugs.
Proof that consent was obtained from a person with "actual or apparent authority" to grant the consent: The person granting consent to search premises or a vehicle need not be the owner of the property.It is enough if the person giving consent has actual authority (authority to consent to the search is actually possessed by the consenting person) or apparent authority (authority that a reasonable person would believe the consenting person possesses).The driver of a car or a tenant in an apartment building could have actual or apparent authority to consent to a search.However, a co-tenant of an apartment may not give consent over the objection of the other co-tenant (see Georgia v.Randolph below), nor can a landlord or motel manager consent to a search of rented space.
Consent is not needed in abandoned nor _______________ circumstances.
emergency
What are the four factors the U.S.Supreme Court listed in U.S.v.Dunn to help distinguish open fields from the curtilage? Give examples of each.What difference does it make whether property is open fields of curtilage?
The exclusionary rule would not apply in a case of an unlawful search and seizure conducted by a private citizen acting totally on their own because
Whether consent is voluntary is a question of fact to be determined by the _____________________.
The police cannot rely on an abandonment argument if illegal police activity caused the abandonment.
If a person validly and voluntarily _____________ their property, they give up all Fourth Amendment protection for that property.
The Fourth Amendment applies to private persons acting without any government involvement.
____________ fields have less Fourth Amendment protection than the home.
The exclusionary rule forbids the use of evidence tainted or soiled by improper or illegal police conduct in criminal cases.Such evidence, however, can be used in _______ cases.
In U.S.v._____________, the U.S.Supreme Court recognized a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule in a defective warrant case.
In U.S.v.Leon, the Supreme Court recognized a/n _____________ exception to the exclusionary rule.
Discuss under what two conditions a reasonable expectation of privacy can exist.
If drugs are thrown away and the police have exhibited proper conduct in causing the abandonment, the drugs can be used as evidence.
Unless the government is somehow involved, the Fourth Amendment does not apply to evidence obtained in a search by a ____________ person.
The exclusionary rule does not apply at civil jury proceedings and ____________ jury proceedings.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)