Exam 4: Direct and Circumstantial Evidence and the Use of Inferences

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

_____________ were designed to protect victims at sexual assault trials.

Free
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(36)
Correct Answer:
Verified

rape shield laws

In some circumstances, presumptions can interfere with the defendant's right to have the jury decide the facts of the case.

Free
(True/False)
4.7/5
(31)
Correct Answer:
Verified

True

Evidence is derived from proof.

Free
(True/False)
4.8/5
(32)
Correct Answer:
Verified

False

Discuss, describe, compare, and contrast direct and circumstantial evidence.Be sure to give examples of each.

(Essay)
4.7/5
(28)

Direct evidence is generally more powerful and convincing than circumstantial evidence.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(27)

When eyewitness evidence is not available, it has often been stated that investigators and officers should ask, as guidelines in investigating crimes, these three questions in guiding their investigation; and secondly, why are those three key words critical to the findings of facts?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(33)

The corpus delicti rule requires that circumstantial evidence be corroborated by direct evidence.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(30)

Proof is the result of

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(30)

The burden of ___________requires the party with the burden on a factual issue to introduce sufficient relevant evidence to prove the fact at issue.

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(37)

Motive is generally an element of most crimes.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(42)

Evidence of prior similar crimes or bad acts is never admissible against a criminal defendant.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(38)

Due process requires that criminal guilt be proven by the government beyond a reasonable doubt.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(38)

Evidence of flight from the scene of a crime is

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)

Inferences of guilt cannot be drawn from the fact that the defendant exercises the _____________ Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(41)

A defendant who possesses large quantities of illegal drugs may, by inference, be convicted of possession with intent to ____________.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(33)

_____________are reasonable conclusions or deductions that fact finders (juries or judges) may draw from the evidence presented to them.

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(30)

In court, similar crimes by the defendant

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(30)

Evidence that the defendant was seen running from the scene of the crime shortly after the crime occurred would be circumstantial evidence of guilt.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(39)

The burden of proof states the level of proof a part must meet to

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(29)

A conviction cannot be valid if it is based solely on circumstantial evidence.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(31)
Showing 1 - 20 of 63
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)