Exam 4: Direct and Circumstantial Evidence and the Use of Inferences
Exam 1: History and Development of the Law of Criminal Justice63 Questions
Exam 2: Important Aspects of the American Criminal Justice System63 Questions
Exam 3: Using Evidence to Determine Guilt or Innocence63 Questions
Exam 4: Direct and Circumstantial Evidence and the Use of Inferences63 Questions
Exam 5: Witnesses and the Testimony of Witnesses63 Questions
Exam 6: Judicial Notice, Privileges of Witnesses, and Shield Laws62 Questions
Exam 7: The Use of Hearsay in the Courtroom63 Questions
Exam 8: The Confrontation Clause and Exceptions to the Hearsay Rule63 Questions
Exam 9: The Exclusionary Rule63 Questions
Exam 10: Where the Exclusionary Rule Does Not Apply63 Questions
Exam 11: Special Needs and Administrative Searches63 Questions
Exam 12: Obtaining Statements and Confessions for Use As Evidence63 Questions
Exam 13: The Law Governing Identification Evidence63 Questions
Exam 14: Obtaining Physical and Other Evidence62 Questions
Exam 15: Obtaining Evidence From Computers or by Use of Search Warrants, Wiretapping, or Dogs Trained to Indicate an Alert63 Questions
Exam 16: The Crime Scene, The Chain of Custody Requirement, and the Use of Fingerprints and Trace Evidence63 Questions
Exam 17: Videotapes, Photographs, Documents, and Writings As Evidence63 Questions
Exam 18: Scientific Evidence62 Questions
Select questions type
_____________ were designed to protect victims at sexual assault trials.
Free
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(36)
Correct Answer:
rape shield laws
In some circumstances, presumptions can interfere with the defendant's right to have the jury decide the facts of the case.
Free
(True/False)
4.7/5
(31)
Correct Answer:
True
Discuss, describe, compare, and contrast direct and circumstantial evidence.Be sure to give examples of each.
(Essay)
4.7/5
(28)
Direct evidence is generally more powerful and convincing than circumstantial evidence.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(27)
When eyewitness evidence is not available, it has often been stated that investigators and officers should ask, as guidelines in investigating crimes, these three questions in guiding their investigation; and secondly, why are those three key words critical to the findings of facts?
(Essay)
4.9/5
(33)
The corpus delicti rule requires that circumstantial evidence be corroborated by direct evidence.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(30)
The burden of ___________requires the party with the burden on a factual issue to introduce sufficient relevant evidence to prove the fact at issue.
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(37)
Evidence of prior similar crimes or bad acts is never admissible against a criminal defendant.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(38)
Due process requires that criminal guilt be proven by the government beyond a reasonable doubt.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(38)
Inferences of guilt cannot be drawn from the fact that the defendant exercises the _____________ Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(41)
A defendant who possesses large quantities of illegal drugs may, by inference, be convicted of possession with intent to ____________.
(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(33)
_____________are reasonable conclusions or deductions that fact finders (juries or judges) may draw from the evidence presented to them.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(30)
Evidence that the defendant was seen running from the scene of the crime shortly after the crime occurred would be circumstantial evidence of guilt.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(39)
The burden of proof states the level of proof a part must meet to
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(29)
A conviction cannot be valid if it is based solely on circumstantial evidence.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(31)
Showing 1 - 20 of 63
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)