Exam 5: Consolidated Financial Statements - Intra-Entity Asset Transactions

Gargiulo Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Posito Corporation, sells inventory to Posito at a 25% profit on selling price. The following data are available pertaining to intra-entity purchases. Gargiulo was acquired on January 1, 2010. Purchases by Posito \ 8,000 \ 12,000 \ 15,000 Ending inventory on Posito's books 1,200 4,000 3,000 Assume the equity method is used. The following data are available pertaining to Gargiulo's income and dividends. 2010 2011 2012 Gargiulo's net income \ 70,000 \ 85,000 \ 94,000 Dividends paid by Gargiulo 10,000 10,000 15,000 -Compute the equity in earnings of Gargiulo reported on Posito's books for 2011.

Bauerly Co. owned 70% of the voting common stock of Devin Co. During 2010, Devin made frequent sales of inventory to Bauerly. There were unrealized gains of $40,000 in the beginning inventory, and $25,000 at the end of the year. Devin reported net income of $137,000 for 2010. Bauerly decided to use the equity method to account for the investment. What is the noncontrolling interest's share of Devin's net income for 2010?

Which of the following statements is true concerning an intra-entity transfer of a depreciable asset?

On January 1, 2011, Musial Corp. sold equipment to Matin Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary) for $168,000 in cash. The equipment originally cost $140,000 but had a book value of only $98,000 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense was calculated using the straight-line method. Musial earned $308,000 in net income in 2011 (not including any investment income) while Matin reported $126,000. Assume there is no amortization related to the original investment. -What is consolidated net income for 2011?

Which of the following statements is true regarding inventory transfers between a parent and its subsidiary, using the initial value method?

Tara Company owns 80 percent of the common stock of Stodd Inc. In the current year, Tara reports sales of $5,000,000 and cost of goods sold of $3,500,000. For the same period, Stodd has sales of $500,000 and cost of goods sold of $400,000. During the year, Stodd sold merchandise to Tara for $40,000 at a price based on the normal markup. At the end of the year, Tara still possesses 20 percent of this inventory. Prepare the consolidation entry to defer the unrealized gain.

For consolidation purposes, what amount would be debited to cost of goods sold for the 2011 consolidation worksheet with regard to the unrealized gross profit of the 2011 intra-entity transfer of merchandise?

On November 8, 2011, Power Corp. sold land to Wood Co., its wholly owned subsidiary. The land cost $61,500 and was sold to Wood for $89,000. From the perspective of the combination, when is the gain on the sale of the land realized?

On January 1, 2011, Pride, Inc. acquired 80% of the outstanding voting common stock of Strong Corp. for $364,000. There is no active market for Strong's stock. Of this payment, $28,000 was allocated to equipment (with a five-year life) that had been undervalued on Strong's books by $35,000. Any remaining excess was attributable to goodwill which has not been impaired. As of December 31, 2011, before preparing the consolidated worksheet, the financial statements appeared as follows: During 2011, Pride bought inventory for $112,000 and sold it to Strong for $140,000. Only half of this purchase had been paid for by Strong by the end of the year. 60% of these goods were still in the company's possession on December 31. -What is the consolidated total of noncontrolling interest appearing in the balance sheet?

Wilson owned equipment with an estimated life of 10 years when it was acquired for an original cost of $80,000. The equipment had a book value of $50,000 at January 1, 2010. On January 1, 2010, Wilson realized that the useful life of the equipment was longer than originally anticipated, at ten remaining years. On April 1, 2010 Simon Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Wilson Company, bought the equipment from Wilson for $68,250 and for depreciation purposes used the estimated remaining life as of that date. The following data are available pertaining to Simon's income and dividends: 2010 2011 2012 Net income \ 100,000 \ 120,000 \ 130,000 Dividends 40,000 50,000 60,000 -Compute the amortization of gain through a depreciation adjustment for 2010 for consolidation purposes.

Stark Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Parker, Inc., sold land to Parker on May 1, 2010, for $80,000. The land originally cost Stark $85,000. Stark reported net income of $200,000, $180,000, and $220,000 for 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively. Parker sold the land it purchased from Stark in 2010 for $92,000 in 2012. -Compute the gain or loss on the intra-entity sale of land.

Which of the following statements is true regarding an intra-entity sale of land?

Strickland Company sells inventory to its parent, Carter Company, at a profit during 2010. One-third of the inventory is sold by Carter in 2010. -In the consolidation worksheet for 2010, which of the following choices would be a credit entry to eliminate the intra-entity transfer of inventory?

Why do intra-entity transfers between the component companies of a business combination occur so frequently?

Chain Co. owned all of the voting common stock of Shannon Corp. The corporations' balance sheets dated December 31, 2010, include the following balances for land: for Chain--$416,000, and for Shannon--$256,000. On the original date of acquisition, the book value of Shannon's land was equal to its fair value. On April 4, 2011, Chain sold to Shannon a parcel of land with a book value of $65,000. The selling price was $83,000. There were no other transactions which affected the companies' land accounts during 2010. What is the consolidated balance for land on the 2011 balance sheet?

King Corp. owns 85% of James Co. King uses the equity method to account for this investment. During 2011, King sells inventory to James for $500,000. The inventory originally cost King $420,000. At 12/31/11, 25% of the goods were still in James' inventory. Required: Prepare the Consolidation Entry TI and Consolidation Entry G for the consolidation worksheet.

On January 1, 2011, Race Corp. acquired 80% of the voting common stock of Gallow Inc. During the year, Race sold to Gallow for $450,000 goods which cost $330,000. Gallow still owned 15% of the goods at year-end. Gallow's reported net income was $204,000, and Race's net income was $806,000. Race decided to use the equity method to account for this investment. What was the noncontrolling interest's share of consolidated net income?

What is the purpose of the adjustments to depreciation expense within the consolidation process when there has been an intra-entity transfer of a depreciable asset?

On January 1, 2011, Pride, Inc. acquired 80% of the outstanding voting common stock of Strong Corp. for $364,000. There is no active market for Strong's stock. Of this payment, $28,000 was allocated to equipment (with a five-year life) that had been undervalued on Strong's books by $35,000. Any remaining excess was attributable to goodwill which has not been impaired. As of December 31, 2011, before preparing the consolidated worksheet, the financial statements appeared as follows: During 2011, Pride bought inventory for $112,000 and sold it to Strong for $140,000. Only half of this purchase had been paid for by Strong by the end of the year. 60% of these goods were still in the company's possession on December 31. -What is the total of consolidated operating expenses?

Norek Corp. owned 70% of the voting common stock of Thelma Co. On January 2, 2010, Thelma sold a parcel of land to Norek. The land had a book value of $32,000 and was sold to Norek for $45,000. Thelma's reported net income for 2010 was $119,000. What is the noncontrolling interest's share of Thelma's net income?