Multiple Choice
In question # 3 above, evidence is introduced that the statute of limitations for filing an EEOC claim is 300 days in the state where the case was filed. Since the performance appraisals which were allegedly tainted by race were issued more than 300 years before the case was filed, the employer moves to dismiss the case, arguing that the statute of limitations has passed, the case has been filed too late. Based on this evidence, what should you decide?
A) the case should be dismissed because the statute of limitations has passed, and the case was filed too late
B) the case should be dismissed because the tainted evaluations triggered the employee s right to file a cause of action, and the case should have been filed within 300 days of the first tainted performance appraisal
C) the Motion to Dismiss should be denied because the employee s right to file a cause of action accrued when she was terminated, and not when a tainted performance evaluation was created
D) the Motion to Dismiss should be denied because the case of a termination based on tainted performance evaluations may be filed at any time
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: The "forced distribution method" of performance appraisals:<br>A)require
Q3: Under the ADA,performance appraisals for disabled persons:<br>A)cannot
Q4: In Metty v Motorola, , a high-level
Q6: Which of the following is true regarding
Q10: Regarding the Drug-Free Workplace Act,which of the
Q13: Under Title VII,in cases of discrimination,punitive damages
Q21: Regarding performance appraisals,which of the following statements
Q22: A 360 degree appraisal:<br>A)is conducted by the
Q24: You are the crew supervisor of a
Q25: Performance appraisals:<br>A)should cite specific instances of good