In This Decision, the Supreme Court Held That Consumer Picketing

Multiple Choice

In this decision, the Supreme Court held that consumer picketing was in violation of Section 8(b) (4) because, unlike that in Tree Fruits, it was "reasonably calculated to induce customers not to patronize the neutral parties at all. . . . Product picketing that reasonably can be expected to threaten neutral parties with ruin or substantial loss simply does not square with the language or the purpose of Section 8(b) (4) (ii) (B) ."

A) Milk Wagon Drivers, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.
B) Westinghouse Electric Co. v. U.E., Local 410
C) NLRB v. Retail Store Employees Union, Local 1001, Retail Clerks Int. Association (Safeco)
D) None of these answers.