In a Case in Which the Employee Claimed Harassment by Her

Multiple Choice

In a case in which the employee claimed harassment by her supervisor in which he altered her work hours with the knowledge that doing so would adversely affect her hypoglycemia; frequently stood at her desk and stared angrily at her; startled her by pounding on her desk with his fist; criticized her work unfairly; and yelled at her in front of co-workers, the court ruled that:

A) no sexual harassment was proven, because no demand for sexual favors was made
B) no sexual harassment was proven, because no hostile environment was created
C) a hostile environment was created by the supervisor's conduct
D) no harassment could be proven without verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature