Multiple Choice
What is the best explanation of why no duty of care was found in Smith v Littlewoods Organisation [1987]?
A) The House of Lords would not find a duty of care as the actions of the third parties were unforeseeable to the defendant.
B) The third party's actions broke the chain of causation.
C) The defendant had omitted to do anything about the third party, but there is no general duty in respect of omissions.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: In Smith v Littlewoods Ltd [1987]), Lord
Q3: It is problematic to find that a
Q4: The law on whether there is, or
Q5: Parents always owe a duty of care
Q6: In which of the circumstances outlined below
Q7: Why did the claimants lose in Palmer
Q8: What reasons have been given to justify
Q9: Complete this quote, taken from Beldam LJ's