Short Answer
Complete this quote, taken from Beldam LJ's speech in Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995], showing why the Court of Appeal thought that the MOD did owe Barrett a duty of care. 'Until he collapsed, I would hold that the deceased was in law alone responsible for his condition. Thereafter, when the defendant _____ _____ for him, it accepts that the measures taken fell short of the standard reasonably to be expected. It did not summon medical assistance and its supervision of him was inadequate'.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: In Smith v Littlewoods Ltd [1987]), Lord
Q2: What is the best explanation of why
Q3: It is problematic to find that a
Q4: The law on whether there is, or
Q5: Parents always owe a duty of care
Q6: In which of the circumstances outlined below
Q7: Why did the claimants lose in Palmer
Q8: What reasons have been given to justify