Multiple Choice
Ford contended that it could not be charged with reckless homicide because the statute violated the ex post facto clause of both the State of Indiana and the U.S. Constitution. What type of argument was Ford making?
A) conceptual
B) corporate
C) constitutional
D) criminal
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Related Questions
Q2: Judge Jones ruled:<br>A) in favor of Ford's
Q3: "Since Ford is not a living human
Q4: Which of the following was the first
Q5: What are the "distributive" and "reductive" functions
Q6: In its attempt to quash its indictment,
Q8: What is the purpose of allocating "punitive"
Q9: Ford argued that the state of Indiana
Q10: Which of the following is true regarding
Q11: Traditionally, in what type of court had
Q12: What was Ford's strategy to prevent this