Multiple Choice
In its attempt to quash its indictment, Ford argued that ex post facto considerations prevented it from being prosecuted. What did Ford mean by this?
A) individual executives, but not a corporation can be tried under Indiana law
B) after Ford had met all existing federal regulatory standards in making the Pinto, a state like Indiana could not then come along at a later date and prosecute the company
C) the conduct for which Ford was indicted (making the Pinto) occurred before the legal statute being used to prosecute the company was passed and made law by the Indiana legislature
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: What "conceptual arguments" did Ford make in
Q2: Judge Jones ruled:<br>A) in favor of Ford's
Q3: "Since Ford is not a living human
Q4: Which of the following was the first
Q5: What are the "distributive" and "reductive" functions
Q7: Ford contended that it could not be
Q8: What is the purpose of allocating "punitive"
Q9: Ford argued that the state of Indiana
Q10: Which of the following is true regarding
Q11: Traditionally, in what type of court had