Multiple Choice
Ford argued that the state of Indiana should not be able to bring criminal charges against the company because Ford conducts interstate commerce and is regulated by the federal government. That is, Ford argued that its indictment should be quashed because federal regulatory standards should preempt state criminal law. In making this statement, what kind of argument was Ford proposing?
A) conceptual
B) corporate
C) constitutional
D) criminal
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: Which of the following was the first
Q5: What are the "distributive" and "reductive" functions
Q6: In its attempt to quash its indictment,
Q7: Ford contended that it could not be
Q8: What is the purpose of allocating "punitive"
Q10: Which of the following is true regarding
Q11: Traditionally, in what type of court had
Q12: What was Ford's strategy to prevent this
Q13: Before the Ford Pinto case, it was
Q14: In order to take on Ford, why