Services
Discover
Ask a Question
Log in
Sign up
Filters
Done
Question type:
Essay
Multiple Choice
Short Answer
True False
Matching
Topic
Business
Study Set
Developing Management Study Set 2
Exam 4: Building Relationships by Communicating Supportively
Path 4
Access For Free
Share
All types
Filters
Study Flashcards
Practice Exam
Learn
Question 41
Essay
Mini-Case: Investing in the 90s. Your inheritance from your Uncle Bruce has just arrived. You have decided to invest the $5,000. The following conversation took place with John, Morgan, and Ivan. Talking to John, "I can't believe Uncle Bruce left me $5,000. Geez ... that's a good chunk of change. So John, what would you do?" John smiles and says, "Plastics!" Now laughing, he says, "No, not really. I think I would place my money in a mutual fund." Morgan, who has just walked up, remarks, "Well, when I won $1,000 last year from playing blackjack, I placed my money into T-bills. The market is overpriced. I'm waiting for the correction." Ivan nods his head in agreement and then asks you, "What is it that you want to accomplish with the money?" You respond, "I want to be rich!!!" Ivan closes his eyes and asks, "Do you want to be rich now or in five years? Are you looking long term or short term?" Frustrated, you say, "This is hard, maybe I should hit the track and have a very good time." All chime in and say, "Once again, what is it that you want your money to do?" -Several response types are illustrated in this story of what to do with your $5,000 inheritance.For each of the following situations,indicate the response type that most likely occurred.Provide support for your answer. Situation #1: John's response to your question is an example of which response type? Situation #2: Which response type characterizes Morgan's comment? Situation #3: Ivan's comment,"What is it that you want to accomplish with your money?" represents which response type? Situation #4: Ivan's second comment concerning whether you want to be rich now or later is the investment long term or short term is an example of which response type? Situation #5: When all the characters respond in unison to your frustration,this is an example of which response type?
Question 42
Multiple Choice
When using descriptive communication to help modify someone's behavior,what should a person do?
Question 43
Multiple Choice
There is a problem with George.You don't doubt his knowledge or ability to do the job.However,lately he has developed a problem concerning his co-workers.He doesn't need or want their input to the project.He says that his work is above standards and remarks,"Can I help it if I work with idiots?" What kind of problem is George most likely exhibiting?
Question 44
Multiple Choice
Morgan has a problem.Her date has been late the last three times to pick her up and this upsets her.Tonight her date is late again.What should she say?
Question 45
Multiple Choice
You have just practiced descriptive communication to modify some problematic behavior.Your subordinate replies,"I have an excuse ...it is not my fault." What should you do?
Question 46
Multiple Choice
Some research suggests that one's communication style may indicate a person's mental health.What did this research find?
Question 47
Multiple Choice
Which variable(s) has research results confirmed to be the most powerful in predicting profitability for an organization?
Question 48
Multiple Choice
If I own my communication,what does that mean?
Question 49
Essay
Rejected Plans Case The following dialogue occurred between two employees in a large firm. The conversation illustrates several characteristics of supportive communication. SUSETTE: How did your meeting go with Mr. Schmidt yesterday? LEONARDO: Well, uh, it went ... aaah ... it was no big deal. SUSETTE: It looks as if you're pretty upset about it. LEONARDO: Yeah, I am. It was a totally frustrating experience. I, uh, well, let's just say I would like to forget the whole thing. SUSETTE: Things must not have gone as well as you had hoped they would. LEONARDO: I'll say! That guy was impossible. I thought the plans I submitted were very clear and well thought out. Then he rejected the entire package. SUSETTE: You mean he didn't accept any of them? LEONARDO: You got it. SUSETTE: I've seen your work before, Leonardo. You've always done a first-rate job. It's hard for me to figure out why your plans were rejected by Schmidt. What did he say about them? LEONARDO: He said they were unrealistic and too difficult to implement, and ... SUSETTE: Really? LEONARDO: Yeah, and when he said that I felt he was attacking me personally. But, on the other hand, I was also angry because I thought my plans were very good, and, you know, I paid close attention to every detail in those plans. SUSETTE: I'm certain that you did. LEONARDO: It just really ticks me off. SUSETTE: I'll bet it does. I would be upset, too. LEONARDO: Schmidt has something against me. SUSETTE: After all the effort you put into those plans, you still couldn't figure out whether Schmidt was rejecting you or your plans, right? LEONARDO: Yeah. Right. How could you tell? SUSETTE: I can really understand your confusion and uncertainty when you felt Schmidt's actions were unreasonable. LEONARDO: I just don't understand why he did what he did. SUSETTE: Sure. If he said your plans were unrealistic, what does that mean? I mean, how can you deal with a rationale like that? It's just too general meaningless, even. Did he mention anything specific? Did you ask him to point out some problems or explain the reasons for his rejection more clearly? LEONARDO: Good point, but, uh, you know ... I was so disappointed at the rejection that I was kinda like in outer space. You know what I mean? SUSETTE: Yeah. It's an incapacitating experience. You have so much invested personally that you try to divest as fast as you can to save what little self-respect is left. LEONARDO: That's it all right. I just wanted to get out of there before I said something I would be sorry for. SUSETTE: Yet, in the back of your mind, you probably figured that Schmidt wouldn't risk the company's future just because he didn't like you personally. But then, well ... the plans were good! It's hard to deal with that contradiction on the spot, isn't it? LEONARDO: Exactly. I knew I should have pushed him for more information, but, uh, I just stood there like a dummy. But what can you do about it now? It's spilled milk. SUSETTE: I don't think it's a total loss, Leonardo. I mean, from what you have told me what he said and what you said I don't think that a conclusion can be reached. Maybe he doesn't understand the plans, or maybe it was just his off day. Who knows? It could be a lot of things. What would you think about pinning Schmidt down by asking for his objections, point by point? Do you think it would help to talk to him again? LEONARDO: Well, I would sure know a lot more than I know now. As it is, I wouldn't know where to begin revising or modifying the plans. And you're right, I really don't know what Schmidt thinks about me or my work. Sometimes I just react and interpret with little or no evidence. SUSETTE: Maybe, uh ... maybe another meeting would be a good thing, then. LEONARDO: Well, I guess I should get off my duff and schedule an appointment with him for next week. I am curious to find out what the problem is, with the plans, or me. (Pause) Thanks, Susette, for helping me work through this thing. 101) Categorize each statement in the case according to the supportive communication characteristic or type of response it represents. For example, the first statement by Leonardo obviously is not very congruent, but the second one is much more so. Answer: This case illustrates a variety of response types that produce a helpful result. One lesson to be learned from this case is that outright advice is frequently not helpful because it may produce defensiveness through invalidation or superiority/inferiority feelings and because it does not produce the same level of commitment to changing or improving. In this case, Bob was allowed to clarify his feelings and formulate a plan of action that would lead to problem resolution. The following statements and principles were illustrated in this case:
-Which statements in the conversation were most helpful? Which were least helpful or could have produced defensiveness or closed off the conversation?
Question 50
True/False
Congruence in communication means that what is communicated verbally and nonverbally matches what the person is thinking and feeling.
Question 51
Multiple Choice
You have called an employee into your office to discuss his poor performance.How might you start the conversation?
Question 52
Multiple Choice
What factor dominates all other factors in determining promotability?
Question 53
Multiple Choice
Managers help employees by addressing problems involving employee attitudes.When managers do this,what is it called?
Question 54
True/False
One suggested reason as to why communication remains a major problem for managers is that they are expected to focus on what organizational goals should be,not how to accomplish the organizational goals.