Solved

The Difference Between a Nash Equilibrium Strategy and a Dominant

Question 14

Multiple Choice

The difference between a Nash equilibrium strategy and a dominant strategy is:


A) nothing;they are synonymous.
B) the former is stable but the latter is unstable.
C) the former must be a best response to all others' strategy profiles,whereas the latter need only be a best response to others' Nash equilibrium strategies.
D) the former need only be a best response to others' Nash equilibrium strategies,whereas the latter must be a best response to all others' strategy profiles.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q9: Consider a version of the Tragedy of

Q10: A Nash equilibrium is a set of

Q11: Nash equilibria:<br>A)always exist in pure strategies.<br>B)generally come

Q12: Which statement is true of the Battle

Q13: The difference between a Nash equilibrium and

Q15: Use the following table to answer the

Q16: For an infinitely repeated game promising A

Q17: Use the following table to answer the

Q18: In the separating equilibrium of the Spence

Q19: In experimental tests of the ultimatum game:<br>A)the