Solved

Field and Lawson (2003) Reported the Effects of Giving Children \quad

Question 5

Multiple Choice

Field and Lawson (2003) reported the effects of giving children aged 7-9 years positive, negative or no information about novel animals (Australian marsupials) . This variable was called 'Infotype'. The gender of the child was also examined. The outcome was the time taken for the children to put their hand in a box in which they believed either the positive, negative, or no information animal was housed (positive values = longer than average approach times, negative values = shorter than average approach times) . Some simple contrasts were performed on the data. Based on the SPSS output given, which of the following statements is true? (Levels of Infotype were entered in the following order: negative information, positive information, no information) .
\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: MEASURE 1
 Source  Type III Sum  of Squares  df  Mean Square  F  Sig.  INFOTYPE  Sphericity Assumed 9.17724.5887.283.001 Greenhouse-Geisser 9.1771.9404.7307.283.001 Huynh-Feldt 9.1772.0004.5887.283.001 Lower-bound 9.1771.0009.1777.283.010 INFOTYPE * GENDER  Sphericity Assumed .5992.299.475.623 Greenhouse-Geisser .5991.940.309.475.618 Huynh-Feldt .5992.000.299.475.623 Lower-bound .5991.000599475495 Error(INFOTYPE)   Sphericity Assumed 51.66482.630 Greenhouse-Geisser 51.66479.544650 Huynh-Feldt 51.66482.000630 Lower-bound 51.66441.0001.260\begin{array}{|ll|r|r|r|r|r|}\hline\text { Source } & \begin{array}{c}\text { Type III Sum } \\\text { of Squares }\end{array} & {\text { df }} & \text { Mean Square } &{\text { F }} & {\text { Sig. }} \\\hline \text { INFOTYPE } & \text { Sphericity Assumed } & 9.177 & 2 & 4.588 & 7.283 & .001 \\& \text { Greenhouse-Geisser } & 9.177 & 1.940 & 4.730 & 7.283 & .001 \\& \text { Huynh-Feldt } & 9.177 & 2.000 & 4.588 & 7.283 & .001 \\& \text { Lower-bound } & 9.177 & 1.000 & 9.177 & 7.283 & .010 \\\hline \text { INFOTYPE * GENDER } & \text { Sphericity Assumed } & .599 & 2 & .299 & .475 & .623 \\& \text { Greenhouse-Geisser } & .599 & 1.940 & .309 & .475 & .618 \\& \text { Huynh-Feldt } & .599 & 2.000 & .299 & .475 & .623 \\& \text { Lower-bound } & .599 & 1.000 & 599 & 475 & 495 \\\hline \text { Error(INFOTYPE) } & \text { Sphericity Assumed } & 51.664 & 82 & .630 & & \\& \text { Greenhouse-Geisser } & 51.664 & 79.544 & 650 & & \\& \text { Huynh-Feldt } & 51.664 & 82.000 & 630 & & \\& \text { Lower-bound } & 51.664 & 41.000 & 1.260 & & \\\hline\end{array}
\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Measure: MEASURE_1
Transformed Variable: Average
 Source  Type III Sum  of Squares  dif  Mean Square  F  Sig.  Intercept 2.034E0212.034E02.049.826 GENDER 1.822E0311.822E03.004.948 Error 17.10941417\begin{array}{|l|r|r|r|r|r|}\hline \text { Source } & \begin{array}{c}\text { Type III Sum } \\\text { of Squares }\end{array} &{\text { dif }} & \text { Mean Square } & {\text { F }} &{\text { Sig. }} \\\hline \text { Intercept } & 2.034 \mathrm{E}-02 & 1 & 2.034 \mathrm{E}-02 & .049 & .826 \\\text { GENDER } & 1.822 \mathrm{E}-03 & 1 & 1.822 \mathrm{E}-03 & .004 & .948 \\\text { Error } & 17.109 & 41 & 417 & & \\\hline\end{array}
\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts
Measure: MEASURE 1
 Source  INFOTYPE  Type II Sum  of Squares  df  Mean Square  F  Sig.  INFOTYPE  Level 1 vs. Level 3 11.090111.0908.762.005 Level 2 vs. Level 3 4471447420.521 INFOTYPE * GENDER  Level 1 vs. Level 3 1.17711.177930341 Level 2 vs. Level 3 1741174.163.688 Error(INFOTYPE)   Level 1 vs. Level 3 51.896411.266 Level 2 vs. Level 3 43.689411.066\begin{array}{|ll|r|r|r|r|r|}\hline \text { Source } & \text { INFOTYPE } & \begin{array}{c}\text { Type II Sum } \\\text { of Squares }\end{array} & \text { df } & \text { Mean Square } &{\text { F }} & {\text { Sig. }} \\\hline \text { INFOTYPE } & \text { Level 1 vs. Level 3 } & 11.090 & 1 & 11.090 & 8.762 & .005 \\& \text { Level 2 vs. Level 3 } & 447 & 1 & 447 & 420 & .521 \\\hline \text { INFOTYPE * GENDER } & \text { Level 1 vs. Level 3 } & 1.177 & 1 & 1.177 & 930 & 341 \\& \text { Level 2 vs. Level 3 } & 174 & 1 & 174 & .163 & .688 \\\hline \text { Error(INFOTYPE) } & \text { Level 1 vs. Level 3 } & 51.896 & 41 & 1.266 & & \\& \text { Level 2 vs. Level 3 } & 43.689 & 41 & 1.066 & & \\\hline\end{array}


A) Approach times for the box containing the positive animal were significantly shorter to the box containing the control (no information) animal.
B) The profile of results were different for boys and girls.
C) Approach times for the box containing the negative animal were significantly longer than for the box containing the control (no information) animal.
D) Approach times for the box containing the negative animal were not significantly different from those for the box containing the positive information animal.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions