Exam 10: The Exclusionary Rule and Entrapment

What is the essence of entrapment?

A defendant is required to have standing to challenge the introduction of evidence at trial.

Unlawfully seized evidence, inadmissible at trial, can be considered during a habeas corpus hearing.

A majority of states follow which test for entrapment?

In which of the following court cases did the Supreme Court hold that an overnight guest possessed a reasonable expectation of privacy in the home?

In Hudson v.Michigan, the U.S.Supreme Court articulated a ______ test of attenuation.

What does the exclusionary rule provide?

If there has been a significant period of time between the constitutional violation and the subsequent seizure of evidence, the connection is said to be ______.

In which of the following case did the Supreme Court affirmed that the exclusionary rule should not be applied in those cases in which the police act in good faith reliance on the assurance of a judge that a warrant?

The ______ provides that evidence that is unlawfully seized nevertheless is admissible where the police are able to demonstrate that the evidence was also obtained through independent and lawful means.

Evidence seized following a failure to follow the knock and announce rule is disallowed at trial via the exclusionary rule.

______ permits the use of unlawfully seized evidence in proceedings that are not part of the formal trial.

One of the many exceptions to the exclusionary rule is to so-called good faith exception.Explain this exception, why the Court allows it, and how it has been used in the past.What are some of the criticisms of this exception? Do you believe these are valid? Why or why not?

Which case established the precedent that evidence obtained as a result of an invalid warrant is admissible at trial if the police reasonably believed the warrant to be valid?

The text lists a series of arguments both for and against the exclusionary rule.List three arguments from each side (from within or outside the text) and explain the rationale behind each.Which side do you feel has a stronger argument? Why?

A failure to provide an attorney at a lineup following the initiation of criminal proceedings results in the exclusion at trial of evidence from the lineup is a violation of the ______.

The ______ in most states is required to act immediately if it wishes to appeal a decision not to admit evidence.

All of the following are considered to be criticisms of entrapment except ______.

All of the following were identified as exceptions to the exclusionary rule except ______.

About half of the states follow the due process test for entrapment.