Exam 4: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

Under a state long-arm statute, a court can exercise jurisdiction only over certain nonresident defendants.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(34)

Most states encourage or require parties to undertake a trial before alternative dispute resolution.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(32)

Generally, because the parties to arbitration are free to agree to the means of the method, a court will not hear a complaint from either party about the results.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(26)

The effect of the minimum-contacts standard is that a business firm has to comply with the laws of any jurisdiction in which it targets customers.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(37)

Doing business within a jurisdiction is not enough for most courts to compel a defendant to appear.

(True/False)
5.0/5
(24)

Ginny and Haruto present their case to an Idaho state court for resolution. The court defers to a different Idaho court's findings of fact in the case, and focuses on the application and interpretation of the law to the dispute. The court currently deciding Ginny and Haruto's dispute is

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)

Hobbes, a resident of Illinois, owns a warehouse in Indiana. A dispute arises over the ownership of the warehouse with Jules, a resident of Kentucky. Jules files a suit against Hobbes in Indiana. Regarding this suit, Indiana has

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(33)

Jurisdiction refers to the right of a citizen to bring a case before a court.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(29)

Any court can exercise jurisdiction over any person.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(34)

A mandatory arbitration clause in an employment contract may not be enforced if

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(35)

Because the Internet is international in scope, it raises international jurisdictional issues.

(True/False)
5.0/5
(35)

In a case involving Internet transactions, jurisdiction is proper only when the defendant conducts substantial business in the jurisdiction online.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(30)

Because the courts have defined interstate commerce broadly, arbitration agreements only slightly connected to interstate commerce may be enforced.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(39)

Cornel and Deanna resolve their dispute over the subsidence of Cornel's real property due to Deanna's excavation for an irrigation pond by having a neutral third party render a binding decision. This is

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(36)

Steel Mill Inc. makes steel forms of substandard quality. Tower Building Company has never bought or used a Steel Mill form, but files a suit against the firm, alleging that its products are defective. The defendant's best ground for dismissal of the suit is that the plaintiff does not have

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(23)

When concurrent jurisdiction exists, the decision of whether to litigate in a federal or state court can be affected by the availability of different remedies.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(25)

Lazlo, a citizen of Minnesota, wants to file a suit against Nadji, a citizen of Ohio. The diversity of citizenship may be a basis for

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)

Liz and Moss disagree over the amount due under their contract. To avoid involving a third party in the resolution of their dispute, Liz and Moss could resolve their dispute through

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(36)

Because litigating a complaint can be costly, and there is a backlog of cases in many courts, a businessperson is likely to attempt to resolve a dispute

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(36)

There are no international conventions or treaties to assist in the enforcement of arbitration clauses because their enforcement is a national domain.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(26)
Showing 41 - 60 of 72
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)