Exam 4: Moral Reasoning and Criminal Justice Ethics

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

Consistency reasoning states that one should identify prima facie duties as the basis for selecting which obligation(s) should take precedence for resolving a moral dilemma.

Free
(True/False)
4.7/5
(33)
Correct Answer:
Verified

False

Pick a criminal justice issue and develop an argument that includes a general moral principle, factual claim and derivative moral judgement or conclusion based on teleology.

Free
(Essay)
4.9/5
(30)
Correct Answer:
Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

One criminal justice issue that can be addressed is the use of mandatory minimum sentencing for non-violent drug offenses.

General moral principle: It is morally wrong to impose excessively harsh punishments that do not fit the crime.

Factual claim: Mandatory minimum sentencing for non-violent drug offenses has led to overcrowded prisons, disproportionately affects minority communities, and does not effectively address the root causes of drug addiction.

Derivative moral judgement or conclusion based on teleology: Therefore, it is morally imperative to reform the criminal justice system by abolishing mandatory minimum sentencing for non-violent drug offenses and instead focus on rehabilitation and addressing the underlying issues of addiction. This approach aligns with the teleological principle of seeking the greatest overall good for society by promoting rehabilitation and reducing the negative impact of mass incarceration on individuals and communities.

Moral dumbfoundedness describes a situation where one acts instinctively and is unable to offer justification for why the dilemma was resolved as it was.

Free
(True/False)
4.9/5
(35)
Correct Answer:
Verified

True

_______ is using one set of criteria for judging our behavior and another for judging the behavior of others.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(30)

A conservative religious leader who proclaims that "no one who is in the faith, and true to that faith, can accept the scourge of abortion perpetrated by godless heathens such as Planned Parenthood that are destroying our society" has engaged in an erroneous _________________

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(27)

Moral arguments consist of a general moral principle (GMP), one or more factual claims (FC), and a derivative moral judgment (DMJ) or conclusion.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(35)

Morally salient facts in any situation are known as:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(42)

Prima facie duties:

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(36)

When an accused argues that his or her accusers are just as guilty of wrong doing, he or she has committed the error in reasoning known as ___________________.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(35)

Moral learning:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(32)

____________ describes an error in reasoning where one has reached a conclusion about the morality of some behavior after carelessly "reading into" the case certain facts that were omitted.

(Short Answer)
4.7/5
(27)

_____________ is the morally salient facts in any situation.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(37)

This involves using one set of criteria for judging our behavior and another for judging the behavior of others:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(36)

These are considered the specific errors people often make in their moral reasoning:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(35)

Pick a criminal justice issue and develop an argument that includes a general moral principle, factual claim and derivative moral judgement or conclusion based on deontology.

(Essay)
5.0/5
(39)

This occurs when we go beyond making the facts in the case manageable and end up distorting them:

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(34)

When I use different logic to resolve similar moral dilemmas, I am violating the law of noncontradiction.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(31)

In moral reasoning, knowing that one has obligations and there are guiding rules or principles to help resolve moral dilemmas is satisfactory.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(36)

To argue a policy of separating young children from their parents who seek asylum after illegally crossing the U.S. border is morally acceptable because most people agree with it illustrates the error in moral reasoning known as ____________________.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(38)

This occurs when we take too much for granted when making a moral judgment about our own behavior or that of another:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)
Showing 1 - 20 of 33
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)