Exam 6: Evaluating Research
In which ways can interpretive research make a contribution to scholarship?
Interpretive research can make a significant contribution to scholarship in several ways. Firstly, it allows researchers to explore complex social phenomena in depth, providing a rich understanding of the context and meaning behind various social and cultural practices. This can lead to new insights and perspectives that may not have been apparent through other research methods.
Secondly, interpretive research often involves engaging with the perspectives and experiences of the individuals being studied, giving a voice to marginalized or underrepresented groups. This can help to challenge dominant narratives and bring attention to issues that may have been overlooked in traditional scholarship.
Additionally, interpretive research can contribute to scholarship by offering alternative ways of understanding and interpreting data. By emphasizing the importance of context and subjective experience, interpretive research can provide a more nuanced and holistic understanding of social phenomena.
Overall, interpretive research has the potential to enrich scholarship by offering new perspectives, challenging dominant narratives, and providing a deeper understanding of complex social issues.
To which warrant is "thick description" related?
C
Which of the following is NOT measured in terms of "validity"?
B
Which aspect of ethics refers to keeping participants' identities secret?
What type of validity refers to the ability of the instrument to measure what is being researched?
To which warrant does the fact that your instrument performs the same way over time correspond?
Why are critical theorists often skeptical of social scientific methods?
Which of the following criteria are warrants for evaluating critical/cultural work?
How do "concurrent validity" and "predictive validity" differ from each other?
What specific aspect of research is difficult to assess for critical/cultural scholars?
In which ways can you improve credibility in interpretive research?
Which of the following(s) does NOT argue(s) that separating the values of the researcher from the topic being studied is not possible?
To what does "precision" refer to when evaluating social scientific research?
Which of the following criteria is NOT a warrant for evaluating interpretive research?
What are the main warrants for evaluating social scientific research?
Which of the following criteria refer to the "resonance" of research?
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)