Question 1

The basic principle which runs through Section 32 to 38 of IPC is that:

Accepted Answer

A) in certain circumstances some part of the act is attributed to a person who may have performed only a fractional part of it. 
B) in certain circumstances an entire act is attributed to a person who may have performed only a fractional part of it. 
C) in certain circumstances an entire act is attributed to a person who may have performed the whole of it. 
D) in certain circumstances no act is attributed to a person who may have performed only a fractional part of it. 
A) in certain circumstances some part of the act is attributed to a person who may have performed only a fractional part of it. 
B) in certain circumstances an entire act is attributed to a person who may have performed only a fractional part of it. 
C) in certain circumstances an entire act is attributed to a person who may have performed the whole of it. 
D) in certain circumstances no act is attributed to a person who may have performed only a fractional part of it.

Question 2

Abetment of any offence when one act is abetted and a different act is done; subject to proviso is dealt under-

Accepted Answer

A) Section 109 of IPC 
B) Section 110 of IPC 
C) Section 111 of IPC 
D) Section 112 of IPC 
A) Section 109 of IPC 
B) Section 110 of IPC 
C) Section 111 of IPC 
D) Section 112 of IPC

Question 3

Dishonest misappropriation of property, knowing that it was in possession of a deceased person at his death and that it has not since been in the possession of any person legally entitled to it is dealt under-

Accepted Answer

A) Section 402 of IPC 
B) Section 403 of IPC 
C) Section 404 of IPC 
D) Section 405 of IPC 
A) Section 402 of IPC 
B) Section 403 of IPC 
C) Section 404 of IPC 
D) Section 405 of IPC

Question 4

Several persons assemble at the door of the house of one K and the appellant struck a blow with a kencha which fell on the left thigh of a workman working in the house of one K whom the appellant and others wanted to attack, and as the appellant struck at the very first person who opened the door and that was how that came to receive the injury.

Accepted Answer

A) every person is guilty of vicarious liability excluding the appellant 
B) only the appellant is to be convicted for the said injury 
C) none is guilty of vicarious liability 
D) none of them 
A) every person is guilty of vicarious liability excluding the appellant 
B) only the appellant is to be convicted for the said injury 
C) none is guilty of vicarious liability 
D) none of them

Question 5

The law on private defence in India:

Accepted Answer

A) is the same as in England 
B) is narrower than the one in England 
C) is wider than the one in England 
D) none of the above. 
A) is the same as in England 
B) is narrower than the one in England 
C) is wider than the one in England 
D) none of the above.

Question 6

In a case P, a married lady was found in a pool of blood and lying on the ground. On the way to hospital in ambulance she breathed her last. It transpired in the evidence that when P was seated outside her jhuggi, her brother came near her and challenged as to why she made a complaint against her own brother R to the police, Her other brother R and Sharma too came. There was an altercation wherein Sharma stabbed her to death. Which of the following is true regarding this particular case?

Accepted Answer

A) As to the vicarious liability of R & C, that the accused Sharma was not carrying an open knife in his hand and there was no evidence to show that this fact was in the knowledge of the other accused. 
B) Sharma had not given any call to his brothers that P should be stabbed to death. Otherwise all the accused had not come together and for that reason it is difficult to assume that all had a prior meeting of mind to cause the death of their sister. 
C) The words used by C were to teach P a lesson for making false accusations. Keeping in view the close relationship, it is difficult to assume that all of them had shared the common intention to kill P. Under these circumstances, there is no reason to rope C and R by aid of Section 34, IPC and they were acquitted. 
D) All of them 
A) As to the vicarious liability of R & C, that the accused Sharma was not carrying an open knife in his hand and there was no evidence to show that this fact was in the knowledge of the other accused. 
B) Sharma had not given any call to his brothers that P should be stabbed to death. Otherwise all the accused had not come together and for that reason it is difficult to assume that all had a prior meeting of mind to cause the death of their sister. 
C) The words used by C were to teach P a lesson for making false accusations. Keeping in view the close relationship, it is difficult to assume that all of them had shared the common intention to kill P. Under these circumstances, there is no reason to rope C and R by aid of Section 34, IPC and they were acquitted. 
D) All of them

Question 7

The consent is not a valid consent under section 90:

Accepted Answer

A) if given under a fear of injury or misconception of fact 
B) if given by a person of unsound mind 
C) if given by a child below 12 years of age 
D) all the above. 
A) if given under a fear of injury or misconception of fact 
B) if given by a person of unsound mind 
C) if given by a child below 12 years of age 
D) all the above.

Question 8

Right of disabled employee as equal citizens not to be defeated by their superiors and they have no right to defeat their lawful rights:

Accepted Answer

A) Sunil Poddar v. Union Bank of India 
B) Mani v. State of Tamil Nadu 
C) Bhagwan Dass v. Punjab State Electricity Board 
D) None of the above. 
A) Sunil Poddar v. Union Bank of India 
B) Mani v. State of Tamil Nadu 
C) Bhagwan Dass v. Punjab State Electricity Board 
D) None of the above.

Question 9

Every person has a right of private defence of his own body and the body of any other person against any offence affecting the human body, has been provided:

Accepted Answer

A) under section 96 of IPC 
B) under section 97 of IPC 
C) under section 98 of IPC 
D) under section 99 of IPC. 
A) under section 96 of IPC 
B) under section 97 of IPC 
C) under section 98 of IPC 
D) under section 99 of IPC.

Question 10

Which of the following is false of Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code?

Accepted Answer

A) it is only a rule of evidence 
B) it does not create a distinct offence 
C) lays down principle of liability 
D) it is a penal provision 
A) it is only a rule of evidence 
B) it does not create a distinct offence 
C) lays down principle of liability 
D) it is a penal provision

The basic principle which runs through Section 32 to 38 of IPC is that:

Abetment of any offence when one act is abetted and a different act is done; subject to proviso is dealt under-

Dishonest misappropriation of property, knowing that it was in possession of a deceased person at his death and that it has not since been in the possession of any person legally entitled to it is dealt under-

The law on private defence in India:

The consent is not a valid consent under section 90:

Right of disabled employee as equal citizens not to be defeated by their superiors and they have no right to defeat their lawful rights:

Every person has a right of private defence of his own body and the body of any other person against any offence affecting the human body, has been provided:

Which of the following is false of Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code?

Indian Penal Code and Criminal Jurisdiction

Criminal Conspiracy and Common Intention Under Indian Penal Code

IPC Sections and Criminal Liability

Justifiable Homicide, Consent, and Defence in the Penal Code

Legal Defenses and Principles in Criminal Law

Consent, Harm, and Defense in IPC

The Right of Private Defense

Abetment and Sedition Laws in the Indian Penal Code

Offences Related to Rioting and Unlawful Assembly

Criminal Offenses and Liability

Culpable Homicide and Murder in IPC

Legal Concepts and Definitions in Criminal Law

Legal and Ethical Dilemmas in Various Criminal Offenses

Theft, Extortion, Robbery, and Dacoity in IPC

Criminal Offences

Theft and Extortion

Exploring the Elements of Forgery and Related Offences in Criminal Law

Jurisdiction, Motive, and Defenses in Criminal Law

Indian Penal Code Ipc Offences

Offences Dealt Under Different Sections of the Law

Filters

Exam 19: The Applicability and Limitations of Consent in Legal Cases

The basic principle which runs through Section 32 to 38 of IPC is that:

Abetment of any offence when one act is abetted and a different act is done; subject to proviso is dealt under-

Dishonest misappropriation of property, knowing that it was in possession of a deceased person at his death and that it has not since been in the possession of any person legally entitled to it is dealt under-

The law on private defence in India:

The consent is not a valid consent under section 90:

Right of disabled employee as equal citizens not to be defeated by their superiors and they have no right to defeat their lawful rights:

Every person has a right of private defence of his own body and the body of any other person against any offence affecting the human body, has been provided:

Which of the following is false of Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code?

Indian Penal Code and Criminal Jurisdiction

Criminal Conspiracy and Common Intention Under Indian Penal Code

IPC Sections and Criminal Liability

Justifiable Homicide, Consent, and Defence in the Penal Code

Legal Defenses and Principles in Criminal Law

Consent, Harm, and Defense in IPC

The Right of Private Defense

Abetment and Sedition Laws in the Indian Penal Code

Offences Related to Rioting and Unlawful Assembly

Criminal Offenses and Liability

Culpable Homicide and Murder in IPC

Legal Concepts and Definitions in Criminal Law

Legal and Ethical Dilemmas in Various Criminal Offenses

Theft, Extortion, Robbery, and Dacoity in IPC

Criminal Offences

Theft and Extortion

Exploring the Elements of Forgery and Related Offences in Criminal Law

Jurisdiction, Motive, and Defenses in Criminal Law

Indian Penal Code Ipc Offences

Offences Dealt Under Different Sections of the Law

Filters