Question 1

The characteristic symptom of Susie's (7;4 years) speech that leads to the diagnosis of articulation impairment is:

Accepted Answer

A)  lateralization of /s, z/. 
B)  stopping of fricatives. 
C)  lateralization of all fricatives. 
D)  lateralization of stridents. 
A)  lateralization of /s, z/. 
B)  stopping of fricatives. 
C)  lateralization of all fricatives. 
D)  lateralization of stridents.

Question 2

What diacritics are shown in Lian's (14;2 years) production of the work Jenny / / $\rightarrow$ [ ]?

Accepted Answer

A)  [ ] indicates nasalization whereas [i ] indicates breathy voice. 
B)  [ ] indicates creaky voice whereas [i ] indicates breathy voice. 
C)  [ ] indicates denasalized whereas [i ] indicates diplophonia. 
D)  [ ] indicates nasalization whereas [i ] indicates tight voice. 
A)  [ ] indicates nasalization whereas [i ] indicates breathy voice. 
B)  [ ] indicates creaky voice whereas [i ] indicates breathy voice. 
C)  [ ] indicates denasalized whereas [i ] indicates diplophonia. 
D)  [ ] indicates nasalization whereas [i ] indicates tight voice.

Question 3

Review Table 16-17 and summarize the perceptual characteristics of Lian's speech.

Accepted Answer

Table 16-17 provides a summary of the pe

Question 4

Accepted Answer

A)  Michael's productions show syllable segregation and Jarrod's do not show syllable segregation. 
B)  Jarrod's productions show the use of the interdental fricative [$\theta$] and Michael's do not. 
C)  Jarrod's productions of birthday cake would be more intelligible than Michael's. 
D)  Jarrod is using Australian English vowels and diphthongs whereas Michael is using General American English vowels. 
A)  Michael's productions show syllable segregation and Jarrod's do not show syllable segregation. 
B)  Jarrod's productions show the use of the interdental fricative [$\theta$] and Michael's do not. 
C)  Jarrod's productions of birthday cake would be more intelligible than Michael's. 
D)  Jarrod is using Australian English vowels and diphthongs whereas Michael is using General American English vowels.

Question 5

What is the cause of Luke, Jarrod, Susie, Michael, and Lian's speech sound disorder? (Remember, causes can be known or unknown.)

Accepted Answer

Speech sound disorders can have a variet

Question 6

Accepted Answer

A)  cluster creation 
B)  cluster reduction 
C)  cluster simplification 
D)  consonant sequence constraint 
A)  cluster creation 
B)  cluster reduction 
C)  cluster simplification 
D)  consonant sequence constraint

Question 7

The intervention approach that could be helpful in addressing Lian's (14;2 years) difficulty creating a phonemic contrast between postalveolar affricates, postalveolar fricatives and alveolar fricatives is:

Accepted Answer

A)  treatment of the empty set. 
B)  minimal pairs intervention. 
C)  core vocabulary intervention. 
D)  stimulability therapy. 
A)  treatment of the empty set. 
B)  minimal pairs intervention. 
C)  core vocabulary intervention. 
D)  stimulability therapy.

Question 8

Comment on the impact of speech sound disorders on children's lives. Use the case history information and assessment results for Luke and Lian as part of your response.

Accepted Answer

Speech sound disorders can have a signif

Question 9

The intervention approach that would not be suitable for addressing Susie's (7;4 years) articulation impairment is:

Accepted Answer

A)  concurrent treatment 
B)  traditional articulation intervention 
C)  minimal pairs 
D)  EPG feedback coupled with concurrent treatment or traditional articulation intervention 
A)  concurrent treatment 
B)  traditional articulation intervention 
C)  minimal pairs 
D)  EPG feedback coupled with concurrent treatment or traditional articulation intervention

Question 10

In light of research by Holm and Dodd (2001), bilingual children with inconsistent speech disorder:

Accepted Answer

A)  benefit from intervention targeting both languages the child speaks. 
B)  need intervention that includes words containing a variety of consonant clusters. 
C)  can show generalized improved consistency in two languages given core vocabulary intervention in one language. 
D)  benefit from core vocabulary intervention targeting lexical consistency of 50 words; 25 words from one language and 25 semantically corresponding words from the child's other language. 
A)  benefit from intervention targeting both languages the child speaks. 
B)  need intervention that includes words containing a variety of consonant clusters. 
C)  can show generalized improved consistency in two languages given core vocabulary intervention in one language. 
D)  benefit from core vocabulary intervention targeting lexical consistency of 50 words; 25 words from one language and 25 semantically corresponding words from the child's other language.

Question 11

Develop a case history questionnaire form suitable for the parents of one or more of the clinical cases (Luke, Jarrod, Susie, Michael, and Lian). Explain why you have included the topics and questions on questionnaire.

Accepted Answer

Case History Questionnaire Form

Child's

Question 12

Which child has a greater risk of literacy difficulties, Luke or Susie? Why?

Accepted Answer

It is not possible to determine which ch

Question 13

Michael (4;2 years) said the word ambulance / / as [ ]. The aspects of Michael's production of ambulance symptomatic of childhood apraxia of speech include:

Accepted Answer

A)  cluster reduction and affrication of liquids. 
B)  vowel distortion and cluster reduction. 
C)  difficulty with liquids and clusters. 
D)  syllable segregation and difficulty with lexical stress. 
A)  cluster reduction and affrication of liquids. 
B)  vowel distortion and cluster reduction. 
C)  difficulty with liquids and clusters. 
D)  syllable segregation and difficulty with lexical stress.

Question 14

Accepted Answer

A)  choose shows cluster reduction whereas chips show palatal fronting. 
B)  choose shows deaffrication and devoicing whereas chips show vowel lengthening. 
C)  choose shows deaffrication without palatal fronting whereas chips shows palatal fronting without deaffrication. 
D)  choose shows palatal fronting without deaffrication whereas chips shows deaffrication without palatal fronting. 
A)  choose shows cluster reduction whereas chips show palatal fronting. 
B)  choose shows deaffrication and devoicing whereas chips show vowel lengthening. 
C)  choose shows deaffrication without palatal fronting whereas chips shows palatal fronting without deaffrication. 
D)  choose shows palatal fronting without deaffrication whereas chips shows deaffrication without palatal fronting.

Question 15

The cause of Susie's (7;4 years) articulation impairment is:

Accepted Answer

A)  repeated head colds. 
B)  losing the upper central incisors. 
C)  unknown. 
D)  repeated middle ear infects. 
A)  repeated head colds. 
B)  losing the upper central incisors. 
C)  unknown. 
D)  repeated middle ear infects.

Question 16

The intervention approach that would not be suitable for Luke (4;3 years) is:

Accepted Answer

A)  multiple oppositions. 
B)  cycles. 
C)  Metaphon. 
D)  core vocabulary intervention. 
A)  multiple oppositions. 
B)  cycles. 
C)  Metaphon. 
D)  core vocabulary intervention.

Question 17

The type of device that could be helpful in addressing resonance problems in children with childhood apraxia of speech and childhood dysarthria is:

Accepted Answer

A)  palatal lift prosthesis. 
B)  portal voice amplifier. 
C)  electrolarynx. 
D)  none, as only surgery and speech production practice can improve resonance. 
A)  palatal lift prosthesis. 
B)  portal voice amplifier. 
C)  electrolarynx. 
D)  none, as only surgery and speech production practice can improve resonance.

Question 18

Do children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have a higher risk of speech, language and/or literacy difficulties?

Accepted Answer

Children with attention deficit hyperact

Question 19

Discuss the importance of gathering and documenting case histories for children with speech sound disorders.

Accepted Answer

Gathering and documenting case histories

Question 20

The intervention that would be suitable for addressing Michael's (4;2 years) difficulty with lexical stress and word length is:

Accepted Answer

A)  core vocabulary intervention. 
B)  maximal oppositions. 
C)  Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment (ReST). 
D)  stimulability intervention. 
A)  core vocabulary intervention. 
B)  maximal oppositions. 
C)  Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment (ReST). 
D)  stimulability intervention.

The characteristic symptom of Susie's (7;4 years) speech that leads to the diagnosis of articulation impairment is:

Review Table 16-17 and summarize the perceptual characteristics of Lian's speech.

What is the cause of Luke, Jarrod, Susie, Michael, and Lian's speech sound disorder? (Remember, causes can be known or unknown.)

The intervention approach that could be helpful in addressing Lian's (14;2 years) difficulty creating a phonemic contrast between postalveolar affricates, postalveolar fricatives and alveolar fricatives is:

Comment on the impact of speech sound disorders on children's lives. Use the case history information and assessment results for Luke and Lian as part of your response.

The intervention approach that would not be suitable for addressing Susie's (7;4 years) articulation impairment is:

In light of research by Holm and Dodd (2001), bilingual children with inconsistent speech disorder:

Develop a case history questionnaire form suitable for the parents of one or more of the clinical cases (Luke, Jarrod, Susie, Michael, and Lian). Explain why you have included the topics and questions on questionnaire.

Which child has a greater risk of literacy difficulties, Luke or Susie? Why?

Michael (4;2 years) said the word ambulance // as []. The aspects of Michael's production of ambulance symptomatic of childhood apraxia of speech include:

The cause of Susie's (7;4 years) articulation impairment is:

The intervention approach that would not be suitable for Luke (4;3 years) is:

The type of device that could be helpful in addressing resonance problems in children with childhood apraxia of speech and childhood dysarthria is:

Do children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have a higher risk of speech, language and/or literacy difficulties?

Discuss the importance of gathering and documenting case histories for children with speech sound disorders.

The intervention that would be suitable for addressing Michael's (4;2 years) difficulty with lexical stress and word length is:

Children With Speech Sound Disorders

Classification, Causes, and Co-Occurrence

Articulatory Foundations of Speech

Transcription of Speech

Theoretical Foundations of Childrens Speech

Childrens Speech Acquisition

Assessment Preparation, Purpose, and Types

Assessment of Childrens Speech

Analysis of Childrens Speech

Goal Setting

Intervention Principles and Plans

Intervention Procedures and Evaluation

Phonological Intervention Approaches

Articulatory and Motor Speech Intervention Approaches

Evidence-Based Practice in Practice

Filters

Exam 16: Individual Children With Speech Sound Disorders: Case Studies

The characteristic symptom of Susie's (7;4 years) speech that leads to the diagnosis of articulation impairment is:

What diacritics are shown in Lian's (14;2 years) production of the work Jenny // →\rightarrow→ []?

Review Table 16-17 and summarize the perceptual characteristics of Lian's speech.

What is the cause of Luke, Jarrod, Susie, Michael, and Lian's speech sound disorder? (Remember, causes can be known or unknown.)

The intervention approach that could be helpful in addressing Lian's (14;2 years) difficulty creating a phonemic contrast between postalveolar affricates, postalveolar fricatives and alveolar fricatives is:

Comment on the impact of speech sound disorders on children's lives. Use the case history information and assessment results for Luke and Lian as part of your response.

The intervention approach that would not be suitable for addressing Susie's (7;4 years) articulation impairment is:

In light of research by Holm and Dodd (2001), bilingual children with inconsistent speech disorder:

Develop a case history questionnaire form suitable for the parents of one or more of the clinical cases (Luke, Jarrod, Susie, Michael, and Lian). Explain why you have included the topics and questions on questionnaire.

Which child has a greater risk of literacy difficulties, Luke or Susie? Why?

Michael (4;2 years) said the word ambulance // as []. The aspects of Michael's production of ambulance symptomatic of childhood apraxia of speech include:

The cause of Susie's (7;4 years) articulation impairment is:

The intervention approach that would not be suitable for Luke (4;3 years) is:

The type of device that could be helpful in addressing resonance problems in children with childhood apraxia of speech and childhood dysarthria is:

Do children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have a higher risk of speech, language and/or literacy difficulties?

Discuss the importance of gathering and documenting case histories for children with speech sound disorders.

The intervention that would be suitable for addressing Michael's (4;2 years) difficulty with lexical stress and word length is:

Children With Speech Sound Disorders

Classification, Causes, and Co-Occurrence

Articulatory Foundations of Speech

Transcription of Speech

Theoretical Foundations of Childrens Speech

Childrens Speech Acquisition

Assessment Preparation, Purpose, and Types

Assessment of Childrens Speech

Analysis of Childrens Speech

Goal Setting

Intervention Principles and Plans

Intervention Procedures and Evaluation

Phonological Intervention Approaches

Articulatory and Motor Speech Intervention Approaches

Evidence-Based Practice in Practice

Filters