Exam 12: Experiments With More Than One Independent Variable
Exam 1: Psychology Is a Way of Thinking65 Questions
Exam 2: Sources of Information: Why Research Is Best and How to Find It65 Questions
Exam 3: Three Claims, Four Validities: Interrogation Tools for Consumers of Research66 Questions
Exam 4: Ethical Guidelines for Psychology Research65 Questions
Exam 5: Identifying Good Measurement65 Questions
Exam 6: Surveys and Observations: Describing What People Do65 Questions
Exam 7: Sampling: Estimating the Frequency of Behaviors and Beliefs65 Questions
Exam 8: Bivariate Correlational Research65 Questions
Exam 9: Multivariate Correlational Research65 Questions
Exam 10: Introduction to Simple Experiments65 Questions
Exam 11: More on Experiments: Confounding and Obscuring Variables65 Questions
Exam 12: Experiments With More Than One Independent Variable65 Questions
Exam 13: Quasi-Experiments and Small-N Designs65 Questions
Exam 14: Replication, Generalization, and the Real World66 Questions
Select questions type
Dr. Gavin is conducting a 2 × 4 independent-groups factorial design. How many cells are in his design?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)
Dr. Elder was interested in the way people recognize objects as members of categories. For example, what makes us recognize a dog as being a dog and not a cat? More specifically, he was curious as to whether people think about categories in a more complex way if they contemplate an "opposite" category first. For example, does a person think differently about the category of "southern" if they first think about the category of "northern"? He is also curious as to whether people categorize differently if they are exposed to category members compared with generating category members. Dr. Elder has four groups of participants (with 30 people in each group). In Group A, participants were told to cut out pictures of dogs and cats from magazines. In Group B, participants were told to cut out pictures of just dogs from magazines. In Group C, participants were told to draw pictures of cats and dogs. In Group D, participants were told to draw pictures of just dogs. After doing this for 30 minutes, participants in all groups were asked to list the attributes that define the "dog" category. Having a higher number of attributes listed was considered to be an indication of thinking about the category in a more complex way. The results of his study are below.
To make his study a 2 × 2 × 3 factorial design, which of the following would Dr. Elder need to do?

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(40)
Dr. Elder was interested in the way people recognize objects as members of categories. For example, what makes us recognize a dog as being a dog and not a cat? More specifically, he was curious as to whether people think about categories in a more complex way if they contemplate an "opposite" category first. For example, does a person think differently about the category of "southern" if they first think about the category of "northern"? He is also curious as to whether people categorize differently if they are exposed to category members compared with generating category members. Dr. Elder has four groups of participants (with 30 people in each group). In Group A, participants were told to cut out pictures of dogs and cats from magazines. In Group B, participants were told to cut out pictures of just dogs from magazines. In Group C, participants were told to draw pictures of cats and dogs. In Group D, participants were told to draw pictures of just dogs. After doing this for 30 minutes, participants in all groups were asked to list the attributes that define the "dog" category. Having a higher number of attributes listed was considered to be an indication of thinking about the category in a more complex way. The results of his study are below.
How many participant variables exist in Dr. Elder's study?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)
Dr. Gavin is conducting a 2 × 4 independent-groups factorial design. How many interactions will Dr. Gavin need to examine?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(32)
In popular media articles, why does the inclusion of participant variable information often denote a factorial design?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(40)
Showing 61 - 65 of 65
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)