Exam 4: Employers: Objectives, Processes, and Strategy
High-performance organizations maximize status differences between individuals in order to motivate employees.
False
The premise of a union avoidance strategy is that employees will not turn to a union if they are treated fairly.
True
Distinguish between a high commitment and a low commitment approach to human resource management.
High commitment and low commitment approaches to human resource management refer to the level of investment and involvement that an organization has in its employees.
A high commitment approach involves a strong emphasis on employee development, empowerment, and involvement in decision-making processes. This approach focuses on creating a positive work environment, fostering trust and loyalty, and promoting a strong organizational culture. High commitment HRM practices often include extensive training and development programs, performance management systems, and opportunities for career advancement. This approach is based on the belief that investing in employees will lead to higher levels of motivation, productivity, and overall organizational success.
On the other hand, a low commitment approach to HRM involves minimal investment in employees and a focus on cost-cutting and efficiency. This approach often results in a more transactional relationship between the organization and its employees, with little emphasis on employee development or involvement. Low commitment HRM practices may include limited training and development opportunities, minimal communication and feedback, and a focus on short-term goals and cost reduction. This approach is based on the belief that employees are easily replaceable and that the primary goal of HRM is to minimize costs.
In summary, the main difference between a high commitment and low commitment approach to HRM lies in the level of investment and involvement in employees. A high commitment approach focuses on developing and empowering employees, while a low commitment approach prioritizes cost-cutting and efficiency. The choice of approach can have significant implications for employee motivation, retention, and overall organizational performance.
A high commitment approach to human resource management emphasizes or includes:
Comparing employers in Canada and the United States,it is more difficult for employers in Canada to oppose unions.
Research has established that high-performance work systems have:
One strategy or approach to unions that an employer could adopt has been referred to as union substitution / avoidance.Describe the objective of the strategy and outline how the employer could implement the strategy.
Company A is in financial difficulty.In contract negotiations with the union the company has demanded a five percent wage reduction.This illustrates:
Employers in Canada and United States have the same opportunities to oppose unionization of their employees.
High-performance practices such as variable pay are welcomed by unions.
An employer's experience with unionization influences the employer's labour relations strategy.
A union acceptance strategy refers to an employer voluntarily recognizing the union.
Which of the following companies are the most likely to pursue a union opposition strategy?
Employers who adopt a high commitment human resource management strategy will develop and rely on the skills of the workforce.
Which of the following is correct regarding high performance work systems (HPWS)/
Which of the following statements correctly describes the majority of Canadian employers:
Identify the meaning of "labour relations strategy" and describe four alternative strategies that could be adopted.
The values or personal beliefs of some managers lead them to pursue control of the workplace.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)