Chat with AIExam 4: Direct and Circumstantial Evidence and the Use of Inferences
Exam 1: History and Development of the Law of Criminal Justice63 Questions
Exam 2: Important Aspects of the American Criminal Justice System63 Questions
Exam 3: Using Evidence to Determine Guilt or Innocence63 Questions
Exam 4: Direct and Circumstantial Evidence and the Use of Inferences63 Questions
Exam 5: Witnesses and the Testimony of Witnesses63 Questions
Exam 6: Judicial Notice, Privileges of Witnesses, and Shield Laws62 Questions
Exam 7: The Use of Hearsay in the Courtroom63 Questions
Exam 8: The Confrontation Clause and Exceptions to the Hearsay Rule63 Questions
Exam 9: The Exclusionary Rule63 Questions
Exam 10: Where the Exclusionary Rule Does Not Apply63 Questions
Exam 11: Special Needs and Administrative Searches63 Questions
Exam 12: Obtaining Statements and Confessions for Use As Evidence63 Questions
Exam 13: The Law Governing Identification Evidence63 Questions
Exam 14: Obtaining Physical and Other Evidence62 Questions
Exam 15: Obtaining Evidence From Computers or by Use of Search Warrants, Wiretapping, or Dogs Trained to Indicate an Alert63 Questions
Exam 16: The Crime Scene, The Chain of Custody Requirement, and the Use of Fingerprints and Trace Evidence63 Questions
Exam 17: Videotapes, Photographs, Documents, and Writings As Evidence63 Questions
Exam 18: Scientific Evidence62 Questions
Select questions type
If a defendant does not testify at trial, the jury may validly use this as circumstantial evidence of guilt.
(True/False)
4.7/5 
(36)
(36) A full confession about the crime would be an example of direct evidence.
(True/False)
4.8/5 (35)
(35) 
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)