Exam 13: Imperfect Competition
Exam 1: Preferences and Utility14 Questions
Exam 2: Utility Maximization and Choice15 Questions
Exam 3: Income and Substitution Effects22 Questions
Exam 4: Demand Relationships Among Goods18 Questions
Exam 5: Uncertainty19 Questions
Exam 6: Game Theory20 Questions
Exam 7: Production Functions14 Questions
Exam 8: Cost Functions20 Questions
Exam 9: Profit Maximization32 Questions
Exam 10: The Partial Equilibrium Competitive Model32 Questions
Exam 11: General Equilibrium and Welfare24 Questions
Exam 12: Monopoly22 Questions
Exam 13: Imperfect Competition21 Questions
Exam 14: Labor Markets20 Questions
Exam 15: Capital and Time20 Questions
Exam 16: Asymmetric Information18 Questions
Exam 17: Externalities and Public Goods25 Questions
Select questions type
Which of the following factors might explain why the long-run equilibrium number of firms can in some instances exceed the socially optimal number?
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(34)
Correct Answer:
C
The Stackelberg outcome differs from the Cournot equilibrium because:
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(32)
Correct Answer:
B
All of the following are problems associated with maintaining a cartel except that:
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(34)
Correct Answer:
C
Each firm in a cartel has an incentive to chisel because market price exceeds:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(40)
In the Hotelling model of spatial competition,profits arise from:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(31)
The Nash equilibrium in a Bertrand game in which firms produce perfect substitutes and have equal marginal costs is:
(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(35)
In a Cournot equilibrium,each firm chooses an output level which:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)
The Nash equilibrium of the Cournot game in which two identical firms face market demand
And have costs
is given by
:



(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(41)
In the Hotelling model,what effect would an increase in the transportation cost t have on,in the first instance,a monopoly firm and,in the second instance,two firms located at the extremes of the line segment who compete over the marginal consumer?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(42)
How does the leader's behavior in the quantity-leadership (Stackelberg)game compare to that in the analogous price-leadership game?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)
The more a firm invests in a new production technology,the lower its marginal costs.Which of the following scenarios involving this incumbent firm and a potential entrant makes the least economic sense?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(30)
A firm's first-order condition from the Cournot game with general demands and costs is:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(31)
A cartel-like collusive solution can be a Nash equilibrium only in price-setting games with:
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(33)
The Nash equilibrium in a Bertrand game of price setting where all firms have different marginal cost is:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)
What factor would not help resolve the Bertrand paradox (that a perfectly competitive outcome can emerge with as few as two firms in the market)if the basic Bertrand model were extended to include it?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(25)
Suppose n identical firms engage in Bertrand competition in a stage game repeated infinitely often.What condition on the discount factor
Is required for firms to be able to tacitly collude on the monopoly industry output?

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(38)
A profit-maximizing firm should spend an additional dollar on advertising so long as this expenditure results in more than one dollar of:
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(31)
Which feature of a market would contribute most to overall social welfare?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(28)
Product differentiation complicates the study of oligopolies because such markets may not:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(43)
The subgame-perfect equilibrium of a two-stage game in which firms first choose capacities and then engage in a Bertrand price setting game resembles the equilibrium in:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(31)
Showing 1 - 20 of 21
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)