Exam 9: Charismatic and Transformational Leadership
Why is the theory of charisma described as a double-edge sword?
Not all leaders use their charisma for positive results.Some leaders use their charisma to promote self-interest.Group accomplishments are used for self-glorification,and ideological appeals are simply ploys to gain power.Other leaders use their charisma to inspire commitment to organizational ideals,not personal goals.Ideological appeals are genuine attempts to communicate a better vision for the organization rather than a ploy to acquire power.It is this quality of charisma to influence both positively and negatively that earns it the description as a double-edge sword.
Describe the limitations of charismatic leadership theory.
Despite the contributions by charismatic theorists to the field of leadership,charisma is not without its limitations.Charismatic leadership theories emphasize the role of an individual leader who takes the initiative for developing and articulating a vision to followers.However,it is more likely the case that in times of crisis (such as an organization facing significant external challenges or serious internal weaknesses),greater success comes from a shared strategic leadership approach than a lone star individualistic approach.
Most of the descriptive literature on effective leaders suggests that charisma in its individualized form may be inadequate to achieve major changes in an organization's performance.In fact,it is more likely the case that positive organizational change is the result of transformational leadership by individuals not perceived as charismatic.Thus,charismatic theories that emphasize "lone star" leadership by extraordinary individuals may be most appropriate for describing a visionary entrepreneur who establishes a new organization.
Charismatic leaders form a close emotional bond with followers based almost entirely on soft power bases,even if the leader occupies a formal organizational position.
True
All of the following statements are true of both stewardship and servant leadership EXCEPT:
Martin Luther King,Jr.,Gandhi,John F.Kennedy,Adolph Hitler,Nelson Mandela,David Koresh (of the Branch Davidians),Herb Kelleher (of Southwest Airlines),and Richard Branson (of the Virgin Group)are/were charismatic leaders.Can you associate with each name a characteristic (see Exhibit 9.3)of charisma you think best describes the individual?
Transactional leadership tends to be transitory while transformational leadership is more enduring.
The absence of which of the following principles makes stewardship almost inoperable?
A major behavior pattern of charismatic leaders is their combination of:
Stewardship is leadership that transcends self-interest to serve the needs of others,by helping them grow professionally and emotionally.
As a leader,I believe my job is to exploit current opportunities rather than chasing new opportunities that may not materialize. This statement is more characteristic of which style of leadership?
Which of the following is NOT one of the four phases of the transformation process?
Leadership that empowers followers to make decisions and have control over their jobs is called:
Which of the following statements about charisma is NOT true?
Transformational leaders are more a function of follower attributions than the leader's vision or accomplishments.
The steward leader is most effective when authority and decision making are centralized.
Mark Zuckerberg,founder and CEO of Facebook,is considered to be more of a charismatic leader than a transformational leader because of his extraverted personality.
A transformational leader such as Herb Kelleher,former CEO of Southwest Airlines,is a leader known for inspiring his employees with more conventional and formal approaches to leading.
Describe a leader in your work experience who manifested positive or negative charismatic qualities.How did this affect your relationship with the leader?
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)