Exam 15: Improving Water Quality: Controlling Point and Nonpoint Sources
Exam 1: The Role of Economics in Environmental Management42 Questions
Exam 2: Modeling the Market Process: a Review of the Basics46 Questions
Exam 3: Modeling Market Failure44 Questions
Exam 4: Conventional Solutions to Environmental Problems: Command-And-Control Approach40 Questions
Exam 5: Economic Solutions to Environmental Problems: the Market Approach40 Questions
Exam 6: Environmental Risk Analysis51 Questions
Exam 7: Assessing Benefits for Environmental Decision Making41 Questions
Exam 8: Assessing Costs for Environmental Decision Making40 Questions
Exam 9: Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental Decision Making37 Questions
Exam 10: Defining Air Quality: the Standard-Setting Process48 Questions
Exam 11: Improving Air Quality: Controlling Mobile Sources37 Questions
Exam 12: Improving Air Quality: Controlling Stationary Sources47 Questions
Exam 13: Global Air Quality: Policies for Ozone Depletion and Climate Change57 Questions
Exam 14: Defining Water Quality: the Standard-Setting Process43 Questions
Exam 15: Improving Water Quality: Controlling Point and Nonpoint Sources51 Questions
Exam 16: Protecting Safe Drinking Water39 Questions
Exam 17: Managing Hazardous Solid Waste and Waste Sites43 Questions
Exam 18: Managing Municipal Solid Waste40 Questions
Exam 19: Controlling Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals35 Questions
Exam 20: Sustainable Development: International Environmental Agreements and International Trade33 Questions
Exam 21: Sustainable Approaches: Industrial Ecology and Pollution Prevention30 Questions
Select questions type
The technology-based effluent limitations are actually performance-based standards.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(52)
When faced with a marginal effluent fee (MEF), each polluting source will
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(44)
According to U.S. water quality control policy, tradeable effluent permits
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(30)
The federal grant program may have created an incentive for over-building of POTWs and a disincentive for cost-minimization.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(32)
Because the effluent limitations are set uniformly, achieving a cost-effective solution is unlikely.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(33)
Ultimately, federal subsidies of POTW construction accomplished little in terms of improving waste treatment for the U.S. population.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(44)
The Nonpoint Source Management Program was enacted under the Water Quality Act of 1987 as a three-stage plan to be implemented at the state level.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(46)
If the effluent limitations are insufficient for a body of water
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(29)
The Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) program replaced the federal grant program and established state loans to support POTW construction and other projects.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(45)
The use of watershed-based NPDES permits allows for permitting multiple point sources within a single watershed.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(36)
Delegating control of nonpoint source pollution to the states can be advantageous because runoff is affected by factors that vary considerably, making uniform controls at the federal level ineffective and difficult to implement.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(39)
In order for the effluent limitations to achieve cost-effectiveness, the MACs of all polluters would have to be equal.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(36)
When polluting sources with different Marginal Abatement Costs (MACs) are faced with a Marginal Effluent Fee (MEF), each abates at a different level, which means that the effluent fee does not achieve a cost-effective solution.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(33)
If the effluent limitations are insufficient for a water body, that water body is considered to be "water quality limited," requiring more stringent controls called total maximum daily loads (TMDLs).
(True/False)
4.8/5
(33)
Showing 21 - 40 of 51
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)