Exam 3: Consolidations-Subsequent to the Date of Acquisition

Figure: Perry Company acquires 100% of the stock of Hurley Corporation on January 1, 2010, for $3,800 cash. As of that date Hurley has the following trial balance; Any excess of consideration transferred over fair value of net assets acquired is considered goodwill with an indefinite life. FIFO inventory valuation method is used. -Compute the amount of Hurley's land that would be reported in a December 31, 2011, consolidated balance sheet.

Figure: Perry Company acquires 100% of the stock of Hurley Corporation on January 1, 2010, for $3,800 cash. As of that date Hurley has the following trial balance; Any excess of consideration transferred over fair value of net assets acquired is considered goodwill with an indefinite life. FIFO inventory valuation method is used. -Compute the amount of Hurley's equipment that would be reported in a December 31, 2011, consolidated balance sheet.

Figure: Following are selected accounts for Green Corporation and Vega Company as of December 31, 2013. Several of Green's accounts have been omitted. Green Vega Revenues \ 900,000 \ 500,000 Cost of goods sold 360,000 200,000 Depreciation expense 140,000 40,000 Other expenses 100,000 60,000 Equity in Vega's income ? Retained earnings, 1/1/13 1,350,000 1,200,000 Dividends 195,000 80,000 Current assets 300,000 1,380,000 Land 450,000 180,000 Building (net) 750,000 280,000 Equipment (net) 300,000 500,000 Liabilities 600,000 620,000 Common stock 450,000 80,000 Additional paid-in capital 75,000 320,000 Green acquired 100% of Vega on January 1, 2009, by issuing 10,500 shares of its $10 par value common stock with a fair value of $95 per share. On January 1, 2009, Vega's land was undervalued by $40,000, its buildings were overvalued by $30,000, and equipment was undervalued by $80,000. The buildings have a 20-year life and the equipment has a 10-year life. $50,000 was attributed to an unrecorded trademark with a 16-year remaining life. There was no goodwill associated with this investment. -Compute the December 31, 2013, consolidated land.

Figure: Watkins, Inc. acquires all of the outstanding stock of Glen Corporation on January 1, 2010. At that date, Glen owns only three assets and has no liabilities: Book Fair Value Value Inventory (FIFO method) \ 40,000 \ 50,000 Equipment (10-year life) 80,000 75,000 Building (20-year life) 200,000 300,000 -If Watkins pays $450,000 in cash for Glen, what amount would be represented as the subsidiary's Building in a consolidation at December 31, 2012, assuming the book value of the building at that date is still $200,000?

Consolidated net income using the equity method for an acquisition combination is computed as follows:

For an acquisition when the subsidiary retains its incorporation, which method of internal recordkeeping is the easiest for the parent to use?

Figure: Perry Company acquires 100% of the stock of Hurley Corporation on January 1, 2010, for $3,800 cash. As of that date Hurley has the following trial balance; Any excess of consideration transferred over fair value of net assets acquired is considered goodwill with an indefinite life. FIFO inventory valuation method is used. -Compute the consideration transferred in excess of book value acquired at January 1, 2010.

On January 1, 2009, Rand Corp. issued shares of its common stock to acquire all of the outstanding common stock of Spaulding Inc. Spaulding's book value was only $140,000 at the time, but Rand issued 12,000 shares having a par value of $1 per share and a fair value of $20 per share. Rand was willing to convey these shares because it felt that buildings (ten-year life) were undervalued on Spaulding's records by $60,000 while equipment (five-year life) was undervalued by $25,000. Any consideration transferred over fair value of identified net assets acquired is assigned to goodwill. Following are the individual financial records for these two companies for the year ended December 31, 2012. Required: Prepare a consolidation worksheet for this business combination.

Under the equity method of accounting for an investment,

Figure: Following are selected accounts for Green Corporation and Vega Company as of December 31, 2013. Several of Green's accounts have been omitted. Green Vega Revenues \ 900,000 \ 500,000 Cost of goods sold 360,000 200,000 Depreciation expense 140,000 40,000 Other expenses 100,000 60,000 Equity in Vega's income ? Retained earnings, 1/1/13 1,350,000 1,200,000 Dividends 195,000 80,000 Current assets 300,000 1,380,000 Land 450,000 180,000 Building (net) 750,000 280,000 Equipment (net) 300,000 500,000 Liabilities 600,000 620,000 Common stock 450,000 80,000 Additional paid-in capital 75,000 320,000 Green acquired 100% of Vega on January 1, 2009, by issuing 10,500 shares of its $10 par value common stock with a fair value of $95 per share. On January 1, 2009, Vega's land was undervalued by $40,000, its buildings were overvalued by $30,000, and equipment was undervalued by $80,000. The buildings have a 20-year life and the equipment has a 10-year life. $50,000 was attributed to an unrecorded trademark with a 16-year remaining life. There was no goodwill associated with this investment. -Compute the December 31, 2013, consolidated equipment.

Figure: Following are selected accounts for Green Corporation and Vega Company as of December 31, 2013. Several of Green's accounts have been omitted. Green Vega Revenues \ 900,000 \ 500,000 Cost of goods sold 360,000 200,000 Depreciation expense 140,000 40,000 Other expenses 100,000 60,000 Equity in Vega's income ? Retained earnings, 1/1/13 1,350,000 1,200,000 Dividends 195,000 80,000 Current assets 300,000 1,380,000 Land 450,000 180,000 Building (net) 750,000 280,000 Equipment (net) 300,000 500,000 Liabilities 600,000 620,000 Common stock 450,000 80,000 Additional paid-in capital 75,000 320,000 Green acquired 100% of Vega on January 1, 2009, by issuing 10,500 shares of its $10 par value common stock with a fair value of $95 per share. On January 1, 2009, Vega's land was undervalued by $40,000, its buildings were overvalued by $30,000, and equipment was undervalued by $80,000. The buildings have a 20-year life and the equipment has a 10-year life. $50,000 was attributed to an unrecorded trademark with a 16-year remaining life. There was no goodwill associated with this investment. -Compute the December 31, 2013, consolidated buildings.

Figure: Following are selected accounts for Green Corporation and Vega Company as of December 31, 2013. Several of Green's accounts have been omitted. Green Vega Revenues \ 900,000 \ 500,000 Cost of goods sold 360,000 200,000 Depreciation expense 140,000 40,000 Other expenses 100,000 60,000 Equity in Vega's income ? Retained earnings, 1/1/13 1,350,000 1,200,000 Dividends 195,000 80,000 Current assets 300,000 1,380,000 Land 450,000 180,000 Building (net) 750,000 280,000 Equipment (net) 300,000 500,000 Liabilities 600,000 620,000 Common stock 450,000 80,000 Additional paid-in capital 75,000 320,000 Green acquired 100% of Vega on January 1, 2009, by issuing 10,500 shares of its $10 par value common stock with a fair value of $95 per share. On January 1, 2009, Vega's land was undervalued by $40,000, its buildings were overvalued by $30,000, and equipment was undervalued by $80,000. The buildings have a 20-year life and the equipment has a 10-year life. $50,000 was attributed to an unrecorded trademark with a 16-year remaining life. There was no goodwill associated with this investment. -Compute the December 31, 2013, consolidated additional paid-in capital.

Figure: Following are selected accounts for Green Corporation and Vega Company as of December 31, 2013. Several of Green's accounts have been omitted. Green Vega Revenues \ 900,000 \ 500,000 Cost of goods sold 360,000 200,000 Depreciation expense 140,000 40,000 Other expenses 100,000 60,000 Equity in Vega's income ? Retained earnings, 1/1/13 1,350,000 1,200,000 Dividends 195,000 80,000 Current assets 300,000 1,380,000 Land 450,000 180,000 Building (net) 750,000 280,000 Equipment (net) 300,000 500,000 Liabilities 600,000 620,000 Common stock 450,000 80,000 Additional paid-in capital 75,000 320,000 Green acquired 100% of Vega on January 1, 2009, by issuing 10,500 shares of its $10 par value common stock with a fair value of $95 per share. On January 1, 2009, Vega's land was undervalued by $40,000, its buildings were overvalued by $30,000, and equipment was undervalued by $80,000. The buildings have a 20-year life and the equipment has a 10-year life. $50,000 was attributed to an unrecorded trademark with a 16-year remaining life. There was no goodwill associated with this investment. -Compute the book value of Vega at January 1, 2009.

Push-down accounting is concerned with the

Figure: Watkins, Inc. acquires all of the outstanding stock of Glen Corporation on January 1, 2010. At that date, Glen owns only three assets and has no liabilities: Book Fair Value Value Inventory (FIFO method) \ 40,000 \ 50,000 Equipment (10-year life) 80,000 75,000 Building (20-year life) 200,000 300,000 -If Watkins pays $450,000 in cash for Glen, what acquisition-date fair value allocation, net of amortization, should be attributed to the subsidiary's Equipment in consolidation at December 31, 2012?

According to GAAP regarding amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets, which of the following statements is true?

Kaye Company acquired 100% of Fiore Company on January 1, 2011. Kaye paid $1,000 excess consideration over book value which is being amortized at $20 per year. Fiore reported net income of $400 in 2011 and paid dividends of $100. -Assume the partial equity method is applied. How much will Kaye's income increase or decrease as a result of Fiore's operations?

Hanson Co. acquired all of the common stock of Roberts Inc. on January 1, 2010, transferring consideration in an amount slightly more than the fair value of Roberts' net assets. At that time, Roberts had buildings with a twenty-year useful life, a book value of $600,000, and a fair value of $696,000. On December 31, 2011, Roberts had buildings with a book value of $570,000 and a fair value of $648,000. On that date, Hanson had buildings with a book value of $1,878,000 and a fair value of $2,160,000. Required: What amount should be shown for buildings on the consolidated balance sheet dated December 31, 2011?

Jaynes Inc. acquired all of Aaron Co.'s common stock on January 1, 2010, by issuing 11,000 shares of $1 par value common stock. Jaynes' shares had a $17 per share fair value. On that date, Aaron reported a net book value of $120,000. However, its equipment (with a five-year remaining life) was undervalued by $6,000 in the company's accounting records. Any excess of consideration transferred over fair value of assets and liabilities is assigned to an unrecorded patent to be amortized over ten years. -What was consolidated patents as of December 31, 2011?

Figure: Following are selected accounts for Green Corporation and Vega Company as of December 31, 2013. Several of Green's accounts have been omitted. Green Vega Revenues \ 900,000 \ 500,000 Cost of goods sold 360,000 200,000 Depreciation expense 140,000 40,000 Other expenses 100,000 60,000 Equity in Vega's income ? Retained earnings, 1/1/13 1,350,000 1,200,000 Dividends 195,000 80,000 Current assets 300,000 1,380,000 Land 450,000 180,000 Building (net) 750,000 280,000 Equipment (net) 300,000 500,000 Liabilities 600,000 620,000 Common stock 450,000 80,000 Additional paid-in capital 75,000 320,000 Green acquired 100% of Vega on January 1, 2009, by issuing 10,500 shares of its $10 par value common stock with a fair value of $95 per share. On January 1, 2009, Vega's land was undervalued by $40,000, its buildings were overvalued by $30,000, and equipment was undervalued by $80,000. The buildings have a 20-year life and the equipment has a 10-year life. $50,000 was attributed to an unrecorded trademark with a 16-year remaining life. There was no goodwill associated with this investment. -Compute the December 31, 2013, consolidated total expenses.