Exam 14: Documenting Data Sources
Ethical, experienced writers acknowledge their unique sources of information for three reasons.
Ethical, experienced writers acknowledge their sources of information for three reasons:
1. **To Give Credit:** Acknowledging sources is a matter of intellectual honesty. When writers use ideas, data, or language that they have borrowed from other individuals or organizations, they are ethically bound to identify the original source. This gives credit to the original creators of the content and respects their intellectual property rights. It is a way to honor the effort and time that others have invested in their work and to recognize their contribution to the writer's own work.
2. **To Establish Credibility:** By citing reliable and authoritative sources, writers can bolster the credibility of their own work. It shows that they have conducted thorough research and are not presenting unfounded opinions. This transparency helps to build trust with the audience, as readers can see the foundation upon which the writers’ conclusions or arguments are based. It also allows readers to verify the information or explore the sources further if they wish.
3. **To Avoid Plagiarism:** Plagiarism is the act of using someone else's work without giving proper credit, and it is considered a serious ethical breach in academic, journalistic, and professional contexts. By properly acknowledging their sources, writers avoid plagiarism and maintain the integrity of their work. This is crucial not only for the writer's reputation but also for maintaining the trust and respect of their peers and audience.
In summary, ethical and experienced writers acknowledge their sources to give due credit, to enhance the credibility of their work, and to avoid the serious ethical violation of plagiarism. This practice is fundamental to the integrity of any form of writing, whether it be academic, journalistic, or creative.
In the abbreviations loc. cit. and op. cit., the word cit means about.
False
Personal communication used as a data source should not be documented in a report.
False
Businesspeople, unlike academic researchers, are not expected to document data sources.
Which statement about documenting data sources in business research is NOT correct?
The APA, Chicago, and MLA style manuals include standards for documenting websites and other electronic media.
Microsoft Word 2010 offers fewer documentation styles than most Web tools, such as Citation Machine.
Omitting documentation for data sources is unethical business practice.
Which statement describes the favored documentation style for business reports today?
Information taken from popular literature, such as a magazine or newspaper, does not have to be documented.
In Microsoft Word 2010, to create a source list automatically, use tools on the__________
To ensure accuracy of a Web address in a source list, copy and paste it from the browser's address box.
Which statement is NOT an advantage of using Microsoft Word 2010 documentation tools?
Expect to see the use of URLs decrease in favor of DOIs for locating references to online material.
Microsoft Word 2010's Citations & Bibliography tool provides APA and MLA styles, but not Chicago style.
In a report, you see this in-text citation: 3:14. It refers to page 14 of the third item on the list of sources.
In general, a URL is better than a DOI for documenting online sources.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)