Exam 33: Regulations, Contracts, and Discovery

In Vo v.City of Garden Grove,the significant,or substantial,government interest that the city of Garden Grove asserts is supported by its ordinance requiring cybercafe owners to provide security guards and install video cameras,among other things,is

The dissent argues that the regulation at issue in Vo v.City of Garden Grove,which requires the installation of video cameras in all cybercafes,would minimize the burden on speech

In a brief filed in Lea's suit against Mica in a state court,Neil,Lea's attorney,cites,Ole! Cafe v.Pan Foods Corp. ,an unpublished opinion.With respect to the persuasiveness of unpublished opinions,most states

In Eastside Grocery Company's suit against Fresh Foods,Inc. ,Fresh seeks to recover the cost to provide cop?ies of e-documents to Eastside.This cost could be awarded if

Capital Credit Company files a suit against Downtown Developers,Inc. ,and seeks,as part of dis?covery,certain electronic documents in Downtown's possession.Responding to this request will most likely be required if the documents contain data that is relevant and

In a brief filed in Gene's suit against Hoyt in a federal court,Ilsa,Gene's attorney,cites,Jon v.Klint,an unpublished opinion.According to a ruling of the United States Supreme Court,the judge in Gene's suit

The United States Supreme Court has consistently ruled that the Federal Arbitration Act

The majority concludes that the regulation at issue in Vo v.City of Garden Grove promotes a substantial government interest that would be achieved

In Circuit City Stores,Inc.v.Adams,the U.S.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Circuit City's contract was