Exam 13: Game Theory and Competitive Strategy
Exam 1: Preliminaries77 Questions
Exam 2: The Basics of Supply and Demand135 Questions
Exam 3: Consumer Behavior146 Questions
Exam 4: Individual and Market Demand173 Questions
Exam 5: Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior177 Questions
Exam 6: Production123 Questions
Exam 7: The Cost of Production166 Questions
Exam 8: Profit Maximization and Competitive Supply149 Questions
Exam 9: The Analysis of Competitive Markets177 Questions
Exam 10: Market Power: Monopoly and Monopsony158 Questions
Exam 11: Pricing With Market Power122 Questions
Exam 12: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly113 Questions
Exam 13: Game Theory and Competitive Strategy150 Questions
Exam 14: Markets for Factor Inputs123 Questions
Exam 15: Investment, Time, and Capital Markets153 Questions
Exam 16: General Equilibrium and Economic Efficiency111 Questions
Exam 17: Markets With Asymmetric Information130 Questions
Exam 18: Externalities and Public Goods123 Questions
Select questions type
Consider the Matching Pennies game:
Suppose both players use maximin strategies for this game. Is there a clear equilibrium outcome to the game in this case?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)
Which of the following is NOT a key component of every game?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(20)
Mitchell Electronics produces a home video game that has become very popular with children. Mitchell's managers have reason to believe that Wright Televideo Company is considering entering the market with a competing product. Mitchell must decide whether to set a high price to accommodate entry or a low, entry-deterring price. The payoff matrix below shows the profit outcome for each company under the alternative price and entry strategies. Mitchell's profit is entered before the comma, and Wright's is after the comma.
a. Does Mitchell have a dominant strategy? Explain.
b. Does Wright have a dominant strategy? Explain.
c. Mitchell's managers have vaguely suggested a willingness to lower price in order to deter entry. Is this threat credible in light of the payoff matrix above?
d. If the threat is not credible, what changes in the payoff matrix would be necessary to make the threat credible? What business strategies could Mitchell use to alter the payoff matrix so that the threat is credible?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(34)
When, in the game in Scenario 13.14, the strategy that would not be chosen under any circumstances is removed, what is left is a
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
Scenario 13.4
Consider the following game:
-In the game in Scenario 13.4, the equilibrium outcome:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(26)
Scenario 13.1:
You are negotiating with your florist over the price of flowers for your wedding. You value the floral arrangements at $500. The florist's cost for the arrangement is $200. You finally settled on a price of $250.
-Refer to Scenario 13.1. Your negotiations are an example of:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(32)
Andre Agassi, a star tennis player, is playing the number one player in the world, Roger Federer. Before the match, Agassi decided that he would serve 20 percent of his serves to Federer's backhand, 30 percent of his serves to Federer's forehand, and 50 percent of his serves straight at Federer. In the language of game theory, this is known as:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(42)
Scenario 13.15
Consider the pricing game below:
-Which is true about dominant strategies in the game in Scenario 13.15?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
Scenario 13.7:
Consider the game below about funding and construction of a dam to protect a 1,000-person town. Contributions to the Dam Fund, once made, cannot be recovered, and all citizens must contribute $1,000 to the dam in order for it to be built. The dam, if built, is worth $70,000 to each citizen.
-Refer to the game in Scenario 13.7. If each player chose a maximin strategy, the outcome would be

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(28)
Scenario 13.1:
You are negotiating with your florist over the price of flowers for your wedding. You value the floral arrangements at $500. The florist's cost for the arrangement is $200. You finally settled on a price of $250.
-Refer to Scenario 13.1. At your negotiated price the producer surplus is:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(32)
Scenario 13.14
Consider the game below:
-In the game in Scenario 13.14,

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(30)
Casey's General Store is considering placing a store in Hamilton, Missouri. If they place the store in Hamilton and no other convenience store enters the Hamilton market, they'll earn profits of $100,000 per year. If competitors do enter, Casey's profits as well as the competitor's profits will be reduced to $0 per year. If a competitor enters the Hamilton market and Casey's does not, the competitor's profits will be $100,000 per year.
Does either player have a dominant strategy? Does the game have any Nash equilibria? What is the maximin strategy of each player in the game?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(33)
Consider the following game in which two firms decide how much of a homogeneous good to produce. The annual profit payoffs for each firm are stated in the cell of the game matrix, and Firm A's payoffs appear first in the payoff pairs:
What are the dominant strategies in this game?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(30)
Scenario 13.6
Consider the following game. Payoffs are in millions of dollars.
-Refer to the game in Scenario 13.6. What will occur if ERS Co. plays a maximin strategy?

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(35)
Scenario 13.9
Consider the following game:
Two firms are situated next to a lake, and it costs each firm $1,500 per period to use filters that avoid polluting the lake. However, each firm must use the lake's water in production, so it is also costly to have a polluted lake. The cost to each firm of dealing with water from a polluted lake is $1,000 times the number of polluting firms.
-Refer to Scenario 13.9. The equilibrium of this game, if played only once, is that

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
Scenario 13.10
Consider the game below:
-The game in Scenario 13.10 is

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(28)
If player R moves first in the game in Scenario 13.14, the equilibrium will
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(33)
Scenario 13.9
Consider the following game:
Two firms are situated next to a lake, and it costs each firm $1,500 per period to use filters that avoid polluting the lake. However, each firm must use the lake's water in production, so it is also costly to have a polluted lake. The cost to each firm of dealing with water from a polluted lake is $1,000 times the number of polluting firms.
-Refer to Scenario 13.9. What kind of game is being played by Lago and Nessie?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
Scenario 13.16
Consider the pricing game below:
-What is true about dominant strategies in the game in Scenario 13.16?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(35)
Showing 21 - 40 of 150
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)