Exam 14: Introduction to Multiple Regression

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

SCENARIO 14-15 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixthgrade proficiency test. She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), mean teacher salary in thousands of dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in thousands of dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y = % Passing as the dependent variable, X1 = Salaries and X 2 = Spending: SCENARIO 14-15 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixthgrade proficiency test. She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), mean teacher salary in thousands of dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in thousands of dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y = % Passing as the dependent variable, X<sub>1</sub> = Salaries and X <sub>2</sub> = Spending:     -Referring to Scenario 14-15,there is sufficient evidence that at least one of the explanatory variables is related to the percentage of students passing the proficiency test at a 5% level of significance. SCENARIO 14-15 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixthgrade proficiency test. She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), mean teacher salary in thousands of dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in thousands of dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y = % Passing as the dependent variable, X<sub>1</sub> = Salaries and X <sub>2</sub> = Spending:     -Referring to Scenario 14-15,there is sufficient evidence that at least one of the explanatory variables is related to the percentage of students passing the proficiency test at a 5% level of significance. -Referring to Scenario 14-15,there is sufficient evidence that at least one of the explanatory variables is related to the percentage of students passing the proficiency test at a 5% level of significance.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(38)

SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below: SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below:     Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-4,the value of the partial F test statistic is _____for H<sub>0</sub> : Variable X<sub>1</sub> does not significantly improve the model after variable X<sub>2</sub> has been included H<sub>1</sub> : Variable X<sub>1</sub> significantly improves the model after variable X<sub>2</sub> has been included SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below:     Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-4,the value of the partial F test statistic is _____for H<sub>0</sub> : Variable X<sub>1</sub> does not significantly improve the model after variable X<sub>2</sub> has been included H<sub>1</sub> : Variable X<sub>1</sub> significantly improves the model after variable X<sub>2</sub> has been included Also SSR (X1 | X2) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X1 | X2) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-4,the value of the partial F test statistic is _____for H0 : Variable X1 does not significantly improve the model after variable X2 has been included H1 : Variable X1 significantly improves the model after variable X2 has been included

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(29)

SCENARIO 14-17 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy)and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age)and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes,0 = no). The results of the regression analysis are given below: SCENARIO 14-17 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy)and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age)and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes,0 = no). The results of the regression analysis are given below:     -Referring to Scenario 14-17,which of the following is the correct null hypothesis to test whether age has any effect on the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff while holding constant the effect of the other independent variable? SCENARIO 14-17 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy)and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age)and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes,0 = no). The results of the regression analysis are given below:     -Referring to Scenario 14-17,which of the following is the correct null hypothesis to test whether age has any effect on the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff while holding constant the effect of the other independent variable? -Referring to Scenario 14-17,which of the following is the correct null hypothesis to test whether age has any effect on the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff while holding constant the effect of the other independent variable?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(34)

SCENARIO 14-6 One of the most common questions of prospective house buyers pertains to the cost of heating in dollars (Y). To provide its customers with information on that matter, a large real estate firm used the following 2 variables to predict heating costs: the daily minimum outside temperature in degrees of Fahrenheit ( X1 ) and the amount of insulation in inches ( X 2 ). Given below is EXCEL output of the regression model. SCENARIO 14-6 One of the most common questions of prospective house buyers pertains to the cost of heating in dollars (Y). To provide its customers with information on that matter, a large real estate firm used the following 2 variables to predict heating costs: the daily minimum outside temperature in degrees of Fahrenheit ( X<sub>1</sub> ) and the amount of insulation in inches ( X <sub>2</sub> ). Given below is EXCEL output of the regression model.       Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 8343.3572 and SSR (X<sub>2</sub> | X<sub>1</sub>) = 4199.2672 -Referring to Scenario 14-5,what is the p-value for Capital? SCENARIO 14-6 One of the most common questions of prospective house buyers pertains to the cost of heating in dollars (Y). To provide its customers with information on that matter, a large real estate firm used the following 2 variables to predict heating costs: the daily minimum outside temperature in degrees of Fahrenheit ( X<sub>1</sub> ) and the amount of insulation in inches ( X <sub>2</sub> ). Given below is EXCEL output of the regression model.       Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 8343.3572 and SSR (X<sub>2</sub> | X<sub>1</sub>) = 4199.2672 -Referring to Scenario 14-5,what is the p-value for Capital? SCENARIO 14-6 One of the most common questions of prospective house buyers pertains to the cost of heating in dollars (Y). To provide its customers with information on that matter, a large real estate firm used the following 2 variables to predict heating costs: the daily minimum outside temperature in degrees of Fahrenheit ( X<sub>1</sub> ) and the amount of insulation in inches ( X <sub>2</sub> ). Given below is EXCEL output of the regression model.       Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 8343.3572 and SSR (X<sub>2</sub> | X<sub>1</sub>) = 4199.2672 -Referring to Scenario 14-5,what is the p-value for Capital? Also SSR (X1 | X2) = 8343.3572 and SSR (X2 | X1) = 4199.2672 -Referring to Scenario 14-5,what is the p-value for Capital?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(28)

SCENARIO 14-8 A financial analyst wanted to examine the relationship between salary (in $1,000) and 2 variables: age (X1 = Age) and experience in the field (X2 = Exper). He took a sample of 20 employees and obtained the following Microsoft Excel output: SCENARIO 14-8 A financial analyst wanted to examine the relationship between salary (in $1,000) and 2 variables: age (X<sub>1</sub> = Age) and experience in the field (X<sub>2</sub> = Exper). He took a sample of 20 employees and obtained the following Microsoft Excel output:     Also, the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Age is 5022.0654 while the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Exper is 125.9848. -Referring to Scenario 14-8,the analyst wants to use a t test to test for the significance of the coefficient of X<sub>2</sub>.The value of the test statistic is . SCENARIO 14-8 A financial analyst wanted to examine the relationship between salary (in $1,000) and 2 variables: age (X<sub>1</sub> = Age) and experience in the field (X<sub>2</sub> = Exper). He took a sample of 20 employees and obtained the following Microsoft Excel output:     Also, the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Age is 5022.0654 while the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Exper is 125.9848. -Referring to Scenario 14-8,the analyst wants to use a t test to test for the significance of the coefficient of X<sub>2</sub>.The value of the test statistic is . Also, the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Age is 5022.0654 while the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Exper is 125.9848. -Referring to Scenario 14-8,the analyst wants to use a t test to test for the significance of the coefficient of X2.The value of the test statistic is .

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(27)

SCENARIO 14-17 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy)and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age)and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes,0 = no). The results of the regression analysis are given below: SCENARIO 14-17 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy)and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age)and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes,0 = no). The results of the regression analysis are given below:     -Referring to Scenario 14-17,the null hypothesis should be rejected at a 10% level of significance when testing whether there is a significant relationship between the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff and the entire set of explanatory variables. SCENARIO 14-17 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy)and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age)and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes,0 = no). The results of the regression analysis are given below:     -Referring to Scenario 14-17,the null hypothesis should be rejected at a 10% level of significance when testing whether there is a significant relationship between the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff and the entire set of explanatory variables. -Referring to Scenario 14-17,the null hypothesis should be rejected at a 10% level of significance when testing whether there is a significant relationship between the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff and the entire set of explanatory variables.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(39)

SCENARIO 14-15 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixthgrade proficiency test. She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), mean teacher salary in thousands of dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in thousands of dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y = % Passing as the dependent variable, X1 = Salaries and X 2 = Spending: SCENARIO 14-15 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixthgrade proficiency test. She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), mean teacher salary in thousands of dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in thousands of dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y = % Passing as the dependent variable, X<sub>1</sub> = Salaries and X <sub>2</sub> = Spending:     -Referring to Scenario 14-15,what is the value of the test statistic when testing whether mean teacher salary has any effect on percentage of students passing the proficiency test,considering the effect of instructional spending per pupil? SCENARIO 14-15 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixthgrade proficiency test. She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), mean teacher salary in thousands of dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in thousands of dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y = % Passing as the dependent variable, X<sub>1</sub> = Salaries and X <sub>2</sub> = Spending:     -Referring to Scenario 14-15,what is the value of the test statistic when testing whether mean teacher salary has any effect on percentage of students passing the proficiency test,considering the effect of instructional spending per pupil? -Referring to Scenario 14-15,what is the value of the test statistic when testing whether mean teacher salary has any effect on percentage of students passing the proficiency test,considering the effect of instructional spending per pupil?

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(35)

SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below: SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below:     Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-3,to test for the significance of the coefficient on aggregate price index,the p-value is SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below:     Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-3,to test for the significance of the coefficient on aggregate price index,the p-value is Also SSR (X1 | X2) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X1 | X2) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-3,to test for the significance of the coefficient on aggregate price index,the p-value is

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(31)

SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below: SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below:     Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-4,which of the following values for the level of significance is the smallest for which at most one explanatory variable is significant individually? SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below:     Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-4,which of the following values for the level of significance is the smallest for which at most one explanatory variable is significant individually? Also SSR (X1 | X2) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X1 | X2) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-4,which of the following values for the level of significance is the smallest for which at most one explanatory variable is significant individually?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(31)

SCENARIO 14-6 One of the most common questions of prospective house buyers pertains to the cost of heating in dollars (Y). To provide its customers with information on that matter, a large real estate firm used the following 2 variables to predict heating costs: the daily minimum outside temperature in degrees of Fahrenheit ( X1 ) and the amount of insulation in inches ( X 2 ). Given below is EXCEL output of the regression model. SCENARIO 14-6 One of the most common questions of prospective house buyers pertains to the cost of heating in dollars (Y). To provide its customers with information on that matter, a large real estate firm used the following 2 variables to predict heating costs: the daily minimum outside temperature in degrees of Fahrenheit ( X<sub>1</sub> ) and the amount of insulation in inches ( X <sub>2</sub> ). Given below is EXCEL output of the regression model.       Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 8343.3572 and SSR (X<sub>2</sub> | X<sub>1</sub>) = 4199.2672 -Referring to Scenario 14-6,the partial F test for H<sub>0</sub> : Variable X<sub>1</sub> does not significantly improve the model after variable X<sub>2</sub> has been included H<sub>1</sub> : Variable X<sub>1</sub> significantly improves the model after variable X<sub>2</sub> has been included has _____ and _____ degrees of freedom. SCENARIO 14-6 One of the most common questions of prospective house buyers pertains to the cost of heating in dollars (Y). To provide its customers with information on that matter, a large real estate firm used the following 2 variables to predict heating costs: the daily minimum outside temperature in degrees of Fahrenheit ( X<sub>1</sub> ) and the amount of insulation in inches ( X <sub>2</sub> ). Given below is EXCEL output of the regression model.       Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 8343.3572 and SSR (X<sub>2</sub> | X<sub>1</sub>) = 4199.2672 -Referring to Scenario 14-6,the partial F test for H<sub>0</sub> : Variable X<sub>1</sub> does not significantly improve the model after variable X<sub>2</sub> has been included H<sub>1</sub> : Variable X<sub>1</sub> significantly improves the model after variable X<sub>2</sub> has been included has _____ and _____ degrees of freedom. SCENARIO 14-6 One of the most common questions of prospective house buyers pertains to the cost of heating in dollars (Y). To provide its customers with information on that matter, a large real estate firm used the following 2 variables to predict heating costs: the daily minimum outside temperature in degrees of Fahrenheit ( X<sub>1</sub> ) and the amount of insulation in inches ( X <sub>2</sub> ). Given below is EXCEL output of the regression model.       Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 8343.3572 and SSR (X<sub>2</sub> | X<sub>1</sub>) = 4199.2672 -Referring to Scenario 14-6,the partial F test for H<sub>0</sub> : Variable X<sub>1</sub> does not significantly improve the model after variable X<sub>2</sub> has been included H<sub>1</sub> : Variable X<sub>1</sub> significantly improves the model after variable X<sub>2</sub> has been included has _____ and _____ degrees of freedom. Also SSR (X1 | X2) = 8343.3572 and SSR (X2 | X1) = 4199.2672 -Referring to Scenario 14-6,the partial F test for H0 : Variable X1 does not significantly improve the model after variable X2 has been included H1 : Variable X1 significantly improves the model after variable X2 has been included has _____ and _____ degrees of freedom.

(Short Answer)
4.7/5
(34)

SCENARIO 14-15 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixthgrade proficiency test. She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), mean teacher salary in thousands of dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in thousands of dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y = % Passing as the dependent variable, X1 = Salaries and X 2 = Spending:  SCENARIO 14-15 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixthgrade proficiency test. She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), mean teacher salary in thousands of dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in thousands of dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y = % Passing as the dependent variable, X<sub>1</sub> = Salaries and X <sub>2</sub> = Spending:     -Referring to Scenario 14-15,you can conclude that instructional spending per pupil has no impact on the mean percentage of students passing the proficiency test,considering the effect of mean teacher salary,at a 5% level of significance using the confidence interval estimate for  \beta <sub>2</sub>.  SCENARIO 14-15 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixthgrade proficiency test. She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), mean teacher salary in thousands of dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in thousands of dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y = % Passing as the dependent variable, X<sub>1</sub> = Salaries and X <sub>2</sub> = Spending:     -Referring to Scenario 14-15,you can conclude that instructional spending per pupil has no impact on the mean percentage of students passing the proficiency test,considering the effect of mean teacher salary,at a 5% level of significance using the confidence interval estimate for  \beta <sub>2</sub>. -Referring to Scenario 14-15,you can conclude that instructional spending per pupil has no impact on the mean percentage of students passing the proficiency test,considering the effect of mean teacher salary,at a 5% level of significance using the confidence interval estimate for β\beta 2.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(32)

SCENARIO 14-8 A financial analyst wanted to examine the relationship between salary (in $1,000) and 2 variables: age (X1 = Age) and experience in the field (X2 = Exper). He took a sample of 20 employees and obtained the following Microsoft Excel output: SCENARIO 14-8 A financial analyst wanted to examine the relationship between salary (in $1,000) and 2 variables: age (X<sub>1</sub> = Age) and experience in the field (X<sub>2</sub> = Exper). He took a sample of 20 employees and obtained the following Microsoft Excel output:     Also, the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Age is 5022.0654 while the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Exper is 125.9848. -Referring to Scenario 14-7,the predicted GPA for a student carrying 15 course units and who has a total SAT of 1,100 is . SCENARIO 14-8 A financial analyst wanted to examine the relationship between salary (in $1,000) and 2 variables: age (X<sub>1</sub> = Age) and experience in the field (X<sub>2</sub> = Exper). He took a sample of 20 employees and obtained the following Microsoft Excel output:     Also, the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Age is 5022.0654 while the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Exper is 125.9848. -Referring to Scenario 14-7,the predicted GPA for a student carrying 15 course units and who has a total SAT of 1,100 is . Also, the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Age is 5022.0654 while the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Exper is 125.9848. -Referring to Scenario 14-7,the predicted GPA for a student carrying 15 course units and who has a total SAT of 1,100 is .

(Short Answer)
4.7/5
(32)

SCENARIO 14-15 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixthgrade proficiency test. She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), mean teacher salary in thousands of dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in thousands of dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y = % Passing as the dependent variable, X1 = Salaries and X 2 = Spending: SCENARIO 14-15 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixthgrade proficiency test. She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), mean teacher salary in thousands of dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in thousands of dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y = % Passing as the dependent variable, X<sub>1</sub> = Salaries and X <sub>2</sub> = Spending:     -Referring to Scenario 14-15,there is sufficient evidence that both of the explanatory variables are related to the percentage of students passing the proficiency test at a 5% level of significance. SCENARIO 14-15 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixthgrade proficiency test. She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), mean teacher salary in thousands of dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in thousands of dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y = % Passing as the dependent variable, X<sub>1</sub> = Salaries and X <sub>2</sub> = Spending:     -Referring to Scenario 14-15,there is sufficient evidence that both of the explanatory variables are related to the percentage of students passing the proficiency test at a 5% level of significance. -Referring to Scenario 14-15,there is sufficient evidence that both of the explanatory variables are related to the percentage of students passing the proficiency test at a 5% level of significance.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(39)

SCENARIO 14-18 A logistic regression model was estimated in order to predict the probability that a randomly chosen university or college would be a private university using information on mean total Scholastic Aptitude Test score (SAT) at the university or college and whether the TOEFL criterion is at least 90 (Toefl90 = 1 if yes, 0 otherwise.) The dependent variable, Y, is school type (Type = 1 if private and 0 otherwise). There are 80 universities in the sample. The PHStat output is given below: SCENARIO 14-18 A logistic regression model was estimated in order to predict the probability that a randomly chosen university or college would be a private university using information on mean total Scholastic Aptitude Test score (SAT) at the university or college and whether the TOEFL criterion is at least 90 (Toefl90 = 1 if yes, 0 otherwise.) The dependent variable, Y, is school type (Type = 1 if private and 0 otherwise). There are 80 universities in the sample. The PHStat output is given below:   -Referring to Scenario 14-18, what is the estimated probability that a school with a mean SAT score of 1100 and a TOEFL criterion that is not at least 90? -Referring to Scenario 14-18, what is the estimated probability that a school with a mean SAT score of 1100 and a TOEFL criterion that is not at least 90?

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(36)

SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below:  SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below:     Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-4 and allowing for a 1% probability of committing a type I error,what is <sup>the decision and conclusion for the test </sup>H<sub>0 </sub>:  \beta <sub>1 </sub>= \beta <sub>2 </sub> \neq  0 vs.H<sub>1 </sub>: At least one  \beta  <sub>j </sub> \neq  0,j = 1,2 ?  SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below:     Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-4 and allowing for a 1% probability of committing a type I error,what is <sup>the decision and conclusion for the test </sup>H<sub>0 </sub>:  \beta <sub>1 </sub>= \beta <sub>2 </sub> \neq  0 vs.H<sub>1 </sub>: At least one  \beta  <sub>j </sub> \neq  0,j = 1,2 ? Also SSR (X1 | X2) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X1 | X2) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-4 and allowing for a 1% probability of committing a type I error,what is the decision and conclusion for the test H0 : β\beta 1 = β\beta 2 \neq 0 vs.H1 : At least one β\beta j \neq 0,j = 1,2 ?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(33)

SCENARIO 14-8 A financial analyst wanted to examine the relationship between salary (in $1,000) and 2 variables: age (X1 = Age) and experience in the field (X2 = Exper). He took a sample of 20 employees and obtained the following Microsoft Excel output:  SCENARIO 14-8 A financial analyst wanted to examine the relationship between salary (in $1,000) and 2 variables: age (X<sub>1</sub> = Age) and experience in the field (X<sub>2</sub> = Exper). He took a sample of 20 employees and obtained the following Microsoft Excel output:     Also, the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Age is 5022.0654 while the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Exper is 125.9848. -Referring to Scenario 14-8,the analyst decided to construct a 95% confidence interval for  \beta <sub>2</sub> .The confidence interval is from _____ to _____ .  SCENARIO 14-8 A financial analyst wanted to examine the relationship between salary (in $1,000) and 2 variables: age (X<sub>1</sub> = Age) and experience in the field (X<sub>2</sub> = Exper). He took a sample of 20 employees and obtained the following Microsoft Excel output:     Also, the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Age is 5022.0654 while the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Exper is 125.9848. -Referring to Scenario 14-8,the analyst decided to construct a 95% confidence interval for  \beta <sub>2</sub> .The confidence interval is from _____ to _____ . Also, the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Age is 5022.0654 while the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Exper is 125.9848. -Referring to Scenario 14-8,the analyst decided to construct a 95% confidence interval for β\beta 2 .The confidence interval is from _____ to _____ .

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(34)

SCENARIO 14-8 A financial analyst wanted to examine the relationship between salary (in $1,000) and 2 variables: age (X1 = Age) and experience in the field (X2 = Exper). He took a sample of 20 employees and obtained the following Microsoft Excel output: SCENARIO 14-8 A financial analyst wanted to examine the relationship between salary (in $1,000) and 2 variables: age (X<sub>1</sub> = Age) and experience in the field (X<sub>2</sub> = Exper). He took a sample of 20 employees and obtained the following Microsoft Excel output:     Also, the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Age is 5022.0654 while the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Exper is 125.9848. -Referring to Scenario 14-8,the estimate of the unit change in the mean of Y per unit change in X<sub>1</sub>,considering the effects of the other variable,is . SCENARIO 14-8 A financial analyst wanted to examine the relationship between salary (in $1,000) and 2 variables: age (X<sub>1</sub> = Age) and experience in the field (X<sub>2</sub> = Exper). He took a sample of 20 employees and obtained the following Microsoft Excel output:     Also, the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Age is 5022.0654 while the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Exper is 125.9848. -Referring to Scenario 14-8,the estimate of the unit change in the mean of Y per unit change in X<sub>1</sub>,considering the effects of the other variable,is . Also, the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Age is 5022.0654 while the sum of squares due to the regression for the model that includes only Exper is 125.9848. -Referring to Scenario 14-8,the estimate of the unit change in the mean of Y per unit change in X1,considering the effects of the other variable,is .

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(43)

SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below: SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below:     Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-4,what annual income (in thousands of dollars)would an individual with a family size of 4 need to attain a predicted 10,000 square foot home (House = 100)? SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below:     Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-4,what annual income (in thousands of dollars)would an individual with a family size of 4 need to attain a predicted 10,000 square foot home (House = 100)? Also SSR (X1 | X2) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X1 | X2) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-4,what annual income (in thousands of dollars)would an individual with a family size of 4 need to attain a predicted 10,000 square foot home (House = 100)?

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(26)

SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below: SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below:     Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-3,the p-value for GDP is SCENARIO 14-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size). House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars. The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression. Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below:     Also SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X<sub>1</sub> | X<sub>2</sub>) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-3,the p-value for GDP is Also SSR (X1 | X2) = 36400.6326 and SSR (X1 | X2) = 3297.7917 -Referring to Scenario 14-3,the p-value for GDP is

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)

SCENARIO 14-17 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy)and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age)and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes,0 = no). The results of the regression analysis are given below:  SCENARIO 14-17 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy)and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age)and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes,0 = no). The results of the regression analysis are given below:     -Referring to Scenario 14-17,the null hypothesis H<sub>0</sub>:  \beta <sub>1</sub>= \beta <sub>2</sub>=0implies that the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff is not related to any of the explanatory variables.  SCENARIO 14-17 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy)and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age)and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes,0 = no). The results of the regression analysis are given below:     -Referring to Scenario 14-17,the null hypothesis H<sub>0</sub>:  \beta <sub>1</sub>= \beta <sub>2</sub>=0implies that the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff is not related to any of the explanatory variables. -Referring to Scenario 14-17,the null hypothesis H0: β\beta 1= β\beta 2=0implies that the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff is not related to any of the explanatory variables.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(38)
Showing 101 - 120 of 256
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)