Exam 11: Factorial Design: I Lost My Phone Number, Can I Borrow Yours Do Pick-Up Lines Really Work
Exam 1: Psychology As a Science: Thinking Like a Researcher154 Questions
Exam 2: The Research Process: Ideas to Innovations153 Questions
Exam 3: Ethics: Making Ethical Decisions159 Questions
Exam 4: The Psychologists Toolbox: Tools for Building Better Designs173 Questions
Exam 5: Qualitative Research: Getting Into the Mind of a Serial Killer151 Questions
Exam 6: Observational Research: the Many Forms of Discipline in Parents Bag of Tricks151 Questions
Exam 7: Survey Design and Scale Construction: Is Going Greek a Great Idea153 Questions
Exam 8: Two-Group Design: Texting: I Cant Get You Out of My Mind156 Questions
Exam 9: Multigroup Design: Im Feeling Hot, but Is the Earth Hot, Too159 Questions
Exam 10: Within-Subjects Design: Can Watching Reality Tv Shows Be Good for Us151 Questions
Exam 11: Factorial Design: I Lost My Phone Number, Can I Borrow Yours Do Pick-Up Lines Really Work159 Questions
Exam 12: Mixed Design: Which Therapy Is Best for Treating Eating Disorders152 Questions
Exam 13: Using Research in the Real World: How Do You Know If You Are Truly Helping153 Questions
Select questions type
A 3 × 3 × 2 factorial design includes how many levels in the second independent variable?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(43)
If you were to develop a table to examine a 2 × 2 factorial design, one independent variable would be notated on the left with each level in a _____ and the other independent variable would be at the top with each level in a _____.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(29)
In a 2 × 2 factorial design using a within-subjects design:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
Hybrid designs include any factorial design that has at least one _____ variable.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)
In a 2 × 2 × 3 × 6 factorial design how many levels does the fourth independent variable have?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(40)
An interaction effect hypothesis is a prediction about how the levels of one independent variable combine with another independent variable to influence the _____ in a way that extends beyond the _____of the two separate main effects.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(36)
An interaction is considered a(n) _____ effect that occurs when combining two or more factors.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(35)
Why would using research confederates be helpful in an experiment?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
A 4 × 3 × 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design includes how many levels in the second independent variable?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(32)
Each of the following is an example of an interaction, EXCEPT:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
In a 2006 study conducted in Scotland researchers asked 200 college students to read a series of vignettes describing a man approaching a woman and using different conversation starters. The researchers found that:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)
Vignettes use _____ situations, events, or scenarios to provide information to a participant.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(34)
The number of potential combinations with factorial designs is:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(31)
In a factorial design, the number of independent variables indicates the number of potential main effect hypotheses, and there are as many interaction effect hypotheses as:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(45)
(Scenario I) Suppose the researchers in Scenario I were unable to create the fictitious movie consulting service environment. Instead, they created four written scenarios that matched each of the four treatment conditions. Participants were randomly assigned to each treatment and were asked to indicate how satisfied they think they would have been based on the scenario they read. This type of design uses:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
Dr. Raqui computed a two-way factorial analysis of variance with types of aggression (relational or overt) and the type of communication method (email, phone, or in-person) as the independent variables, and the level of self-esteem as the dependent variable. The relational aggression main effect was significant, F(1, 222) = 4.2, p = .001, eta2 = .031. Which of the following represents the significance level?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(27)
Cindy asked Dr. Carlisle to repeat her comment about interaction effects with regard to factorial design. Dr. Carlisle had stated that it is possible to hypothesize interactions without predicting:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
Dr. Raqui computed a two-way factorial analysis of variance with types of aggression (relational or overt) and the type of communication method (email, phone, or in-person) as the independent variables, and the level of self-esteem as the dependent variable. The relational aggression main effect was significant, F(1, 222) = 4.2, p = .001, eta2 = .031. Which of the following represents the between-subjects degrees of freedom?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(45)
Senko and Fyffe (2010) conducted a study in 2010 among female college students interested in examining preferences for opening pick-up lines. The female participants:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(41)
Showing 101 - 120 of 159
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)