Exam 15: The Logic of Multivariate Analysis
When the partial relationship is essentially the same as the original relationship, the term "specification" is applied to the result.
True
Mabel did a study on regional differences in Christmas gift-giving and, after observing the empirical relationship, she developed a hypothesis to explain the relationship. Mabel was engaging in:
A
Compare and contrast explanation and interpretation. Give examples of both.
Explanation and interpretation are two different approaches to understanding and analyzing information.
Explanation involves providing a clear and logical account of a concept or phenomenon. It aims to clarify the meaning or cause of something by breaking it down into its constituent parts and showing how they relate to each other. For example, in science, an explanation of the water cycle would involve detailing the processes of evaporation, condensation, and precipitation and how they interact to form the cycle.
Interpretation, on the other hand, involves making sense of something by offering a subjective understanding or perspective. It goes beyond the facts to consider the implications, significance, or underlying meanings of a concept or event. For example, in literature, interpreting a poem involves analyzing the symbolism, themes, and emotions conveyed by the language and imagery used.
To further illustrate the difference, consider the concept of a sunset. An explanation of a sunset would involve describing the scientific processes of the Earth's rotation and the scattering of light that result in the changing colors of the sky. An interpretation of a sunset, on the other hand, might involve reflecting on the beauty and symbolism of the event, such as its associations with endings and new beginnings.
In summary, explanation focuses on providing a clear account of the facts or causes of something, while interpretation delves into the subjective meanings and implications of a concept or event. Both approaches are valuable for gaining a comprehensive understanding of the world around us.
Explanation is the term used to describe a spurious relationship.
Having observed an empirical relationship between two variables, we seek to understand the nature of that relationship through the effects produced by introducing other variables. In view of this, what is the basic form of the elaboration model?
Studying the relationship between parental supervision and juvenile delinquency, Maria found a strong relationship between the two. She then introduced a third variable, education, and the partials still showed a strong relationship between supervision and delinquency. What may she conclude?
Whenever partial relationships are essentially the same as the original relationship, the term assigned to the result, regardless of whether the test variable is antecedent or intervening, is a(n):
When using the elaboration paradigm, you should always begin with an observed relationship.
Forrester found a strong positive relationship between participation in high school extracurricular activities and community involvement as adults. He controlled for gender, and the relationship between high school extracurricular activities and community involvement appeared among the men but not at all among the women. Which type of elaboration analysis is this?
What is a replication in the elaboration model? What does it tell you about the relationships uncovered in the original analysis?
The elaboration model can only be used on dichotomous variables.
When partial relationships and original relationships are essentially the same, it is an example of:
The purpose of the elaboration model is to provide a way to examine relationships that may be causal.
Which one of the following is the term used to describe a spurious relationship?
Suppose we observed that the more firefighters there were at a fire site, the greater the amount of fire damage. Suppose we also observed that the size of the fire was related to both the amount of damage and the number of firefighters present. The relationship between numbers of firefighters and the amount of fire damage illustrates that:
The term "specification" is used in the elaboration model regardless of whether the test variable is antecedent or intervening.
What is meant by ex post facto hypothesizing? Why does it sometimes mislead inexperienced researchers?
Which elaboration paradigm is used to describe the situation when an elaboration test identifies partial relationships that are different from each other? Give an example and interpret the results.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)