A) have no right to evaluation data. B) may have evaluation data if they are personally paying for the service. C) could be sent a summary of the evaluation, which includes no confidential information. D) should be approved on a case-by-case basis before receiving any program evaluation results. A) have no right to evaluation data. B) may have evaluation data if they are personally paying for the service. C) could be sent a summary of the evaluation, which includes no confidential information. D) should be approved on a case-by-case basis before receiving any program evaluation results.

Exam 13: Evaluation Reports: Interpreting and Communicating Findings

Describe some ways that recommendations could be offered that increase the probability of their being totally rejected by the stakeholders.

Free

(Essay)

4.8/5

(39)

Question 1

Correct Answer:

Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

There are several ways that recommendations could be offered that increase the probability of their being totally rejected by stakeholders.

1. Lack of stakeholder involvement: If recommendations are developed without input or involvement from the stakeholders, they are more likely to be rejected. Stakeholders may feel that their perspectives and needs were not taken into account, leading to a lack of buy-in for the recommendations.

2. Poor communication: If the recommendations are not effectively communicated to the stakeholders, they may not fully understand the rationale behind them or the potential benefits. This lack of understanding can lead to rejection of the recommendations.

3. Ignoring stakeholder concerns: If the recommendations do not address the concerns or priorities of the stakeholders, they are likely to be rejected. It is important to consider the needs and perspectives of the stakeholders when developing recommendations.

4. Lack of evidence or support: If the recommendations are not backed up by data, evidence, or support from experts, stakeholders may be hesitant to accept them. It is important to provide a strong rationale for the recommendations in order to increase the likelihood of acceptance.

5. Lack of alignment with organizational goals: If the recommendations do not align with the overall goals and objectives of the organization, stakeholders may see them as irrelevant or counterproductive. It is important to ensure that recommendations are in line with the broader strategic direction of the organization.

By addressing these potential pitfalls and ensuring that recommendations are developed in a collaborative, well-communicated, evidence-based, and aligned manner, the probability of their being totally rejected by stakeholders can be minimized.

Evaluators recognize that an oral presentation of findings

Free

(Multiple Choice)

4.8/5

(34)

Question 2

Correct Answer:

Verified

Why is it important to send progress reports to stakeholders while the evaluation is underway?

Free

(Short Answer)

4.8/5

(36)

Question 3

Correct Answer:

Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

Sending progress reports to stakeholders while an evaluation is underway is important for several reasons:

1. **Transparency**: Regular progress reports ensure that stakeholders are kept informed about the status of the evaluation. This transparency helps to build trust and credibility, as stakeholders can see that the evaluation process is being conducted in an open and accountable manner.

2. **Engagement**: Keeping stakeholders updated encourages their ongoing engagement with the evaluation process. Engaged stakeholders are more likely to provide valuable input, support the evaluation activities, and be receptive to the findings and recommendations.

3. **Expectation Management**: Progress reports help to manage stakeholders' expectations by providing them with a realistic view of the evaluation timeline, potential challenges, and progress made. This can prevent misunderstandings and unrealistic demands.

4. **Feedback Loop**: Regular reporting creates opportunities for stakeholders to provide feedback, which can be invaluable for the evaluation team. This feedback can help to refine the evaluation approach, address any concerns, and ensure that the evaluation remains relevant and useful to stakeholders' needs.

5. **Decision Making**: Progress reports can provide interim findings or early insights that may inform decision-making processes. Stakeholders may use this information to make adjustments or take action even before the final evaluation report is completed.

6. **Risk Management**: By reporting on progress, evaluators can also communicate any risks or issues that have arisen during the evaluation. This early warning system allows stakeholders to address problems promptly, potentially saving time, resources, and ensuring the evaluation's success.

7. **Resource Allocation**: Progress reports can highlight areas where additional resources may be needed to complete the evaluation successfully. This allows stakeholders to make timely decisions about reallocating resources or providing additional support.

8. **Accountability**: Regular updates hold the evaluation team accountable for their work and timelines. This can motivate the team to stay on track and meet the expectations set out at the beginning of the evaluation.

9. **Learning and Improvement**: Progress reports can document lessons learned during the evaluation process. These insights can be used to improve current and future evaluations, contributing to a culture of continuous improvement.

In summary, sending progress reports to stakeholders during an evaluation is a key aspect of good project management and communication. It ensures that everyone involved is informed, engaged, and able to contribute to the evaluation's success.

In presenting evaluation results

(Multiple Choice)

4.9/5

(39)

Question 4

The use of various versions of evaluation reports is prompted by the need to

(Multiple Choice)

4.8/5

(37)

Question 5

Small improvements in outcome variables

(Multiple Choice)

4.8/5

(36)

Question 6

In presenting a written report, a conflict about who has the right to see the report first may be reduced by

(Multiple Choice)

5.0/5

(33)

Question 7

Program participants

(Multiple Choice)

4.9/5

(29)

Question 8

Evaluation data, unlike basic research data, belong to

(Multiple Choice)

4.8/5

(40)

Question 9

The "adequacy" of a program refers to whether

(Multiple Choice)

4.8/5

(28)

Question 10

An evaluation report could be more difficult to write than an article on basic research because

(Multiple Choice)

4.8/5

(35)

Question 11

Methods of selecting a sample are described in reports because -----

(Multiple Choice)

4.9/5

(33)

Question 12

Contrast the different emphases that distinguish an evaluation report from an article in a research journal.

(Essay)

4.9/5

(38)

Question 13

Plans for communicating the findings of evaluations

(Multiple Choice)

4.7/5

(33)

Question 14

Large sample sizes tempt evaluators and writers of popular reports of evaluations (e.g. newspaper reporters) to

(Multiple Choice)

4.9/5

(36)

Question 15

Contrast the issues that would be the focus of (a) program evaluation report available to program managers, versus (b) a report prepared for recipients of program services.

(Essay)

4.8/5

(36)

Question 16

Small improvements in important variables-death rate, for example-are

(Multiple Choice)

4.8/5

(34)

Question 17

When preparing evaluation reports, it is important to reflect on

(Multiple Choice)

4.7/5

(26)

Question 18

Mixing quantitative summaries of observations and qualitative descriptions of the program

(Multiple Choice)

4.9/5

(35)

Question 19

A strong argument for letting the program manager and staff see a near-to-completed draft before other stakeholders do is to --

(Multiple Choice)

5.0/5

(31)

Question 20

Showing 1 - 20 of 29

Describe some ways that recommendations could be offered that increase the probability of their being totally rejected by the stakeholders.

Evaluators recognize that an oral presentation of findings

Why is it important to send progress reports to stakeholders while the evaluation is underway?

In presenting evaluation results

The use of various versions of evaluation reports is prompted by the need to

Small improvements in outcome variables

In presenting a written report, a conflict about who has the right to see the report first may be reduced by

Program participants

Evaluation data, unlike basic research data, belong to

The "adequacy" of a program refers to whether

An evaluation report could be more difficult to write than an article on basic research because

Methods of selecting a sample are described in reports because -----

Contrast the different emphases that distinguish an evaluation report from an article in a research journal.

Plans for communicating the findings of evaluations

Large sample sizes tempt evaluators and writers of popular reports of evaluations (e.g. newspaper reporters) to

Contrast the issues that would be the focus of (a) program evaluation report available to program managers, versus (b) a report prepared for recipients of program services.

Small improvements in important variables-death rate, for example-are

When preparing evaluation reports, it is important to reflect on

Mixing quantitative summaries of observations and qualitative descriptions of the program

A strong argument for letting the program manager and staff see a near-to-completed draft before other stakeholders do is to --

Program Evaluation : an Overview

Planning an Evaluation

Developing and Using a Theory of the Program

Developing Measures of Implementation and Outcomes

Ethics in Program Evaluation

The Assessment of Need

Monitoring the Implementation and the Operation of Programs

Qualitative Evaluation Methods

Outcome Evaluations With One Group

Quasi-Experimental Approaches to Outcome Evaluation

Using Experiments to Evaluate Programs

Analyses of Costs and Outcomes

How to Encourage Utilization

Filters