Exam 32: Moral Panic Versus the Risk Society: the Implications of the Changing Sites of Social Anxiety, Sheldon Ungar

Correct Answer:

Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

In his article, Ungar lays out several criteria and descriptions of a moral panic, including exaggerated or distorted media coverage, public concern and fear, and the identification of a scapegoat or "folk devil." Applying these criteria to media coverage of violent crime, it becomes clear that it fits the definition of a moral panic.

Firstly, media coverage of violent crime often exaggerates or distorts the actual prevalence of such crimes. Sensationalized headlines and graphic imagery can create a perception that violent crime is more widespread than it actually is, leading to public concern and fear. For example, a news report that focuses on a single violent incident in a particular neighborhood may lead viewers to believe that the entire area is unsafe, even if the crime rate is relatively low overall.

Secondly, the public's reaction to media coverage of violent crime often aligns with the criteria of a moral panic. People may become more fearful and anxious about their safety, leading to calls for increased policing or harsher punishments for offenders. This fear and concern can also lead to the identification of a scapegoat or "folk devil," such as a particular demographic group or social issue that is blamed for the perceived increase in violent crime.

Furthermore, media coverage of violent crime can be seen as evidence of a society at risk. The fact that such coverage can provoke widespread fear and concern suggests that there is a lack of trust in the ability of the criminal justice system to keep people safe. Additionally, the identification of a scapegoat or "folk devil" can lead to social division and prejudice, further undermining the cohesion of society.

In conclusion, media coverage of violent crime meets the criteria and descriptions of a moral panic as outlined by Ungar. It exaggerates and distorts the reality of violent crime, leading to public concern and fear, and often identifies a scapegoat or "folk devil." This coverage also serves as evidence of a society at risk, as it can provoke widespread fear and distrust in the criminal justice system, as well as contribute to social division and prejudice.