Exam 18: Hobbes, Locke, and Berkeley: Materialism and the Beginnings of Empiricism
Compare Hobbes, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume on our knowledge of ourselves.
Hobbes, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume all had different perspectives on our knowledge of ourselves.
Thomas Hobbes believed that our knowledge of ourselves comes from our sensory experiences and perceptions. He argued that all knowledge is derived from sensation and that the mind is a blank slate at birth, with all knowledge coming from external experiences.
John Locke also emphasized the role of sensory experiences in shaping our knowledge of ourselves. He proposed the concept of tabula rasa, or the idea that the mind is a blank slate at birth and that all knowledge comes from experience. Locke believed that our knowledge of ourselves is based on our perceptions and experiences, and that our identity is shaped by our interactions with the external world.
George Berkeley, on the other hand, rejected the idea of material substance and argued that our knowledge of ourselves and the world is based on our perceptions. He believed that the only things that exist are those that are perceived, and that our knowledge of ourselves is based on our perceptions and experiences.
David Hume also emphasized the role of perceptions and experiences in shaping our knowledge of ourselves. He argued that our sense perceptions and experiences are the foundation of all knowledge, and that our understanding of ourselves is based on our perceptions and experiences.
In summary, Hobbes, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume all emphasized the role of sensory experiences and perceptions in shaping our knowledge of ourselves, but they had different perspectives on the nature of knowledge and the self.
Hume thinks we can have both modern science and human freedom. This is because
D
What is Hume's view about the self or soul?
We do have the idea of a self, the idea of something simple and unchanging that persists through time and explains why we are the same today as we were years ago. Hume asks: From what impression is this idea derived? When he looks inside himself, he says, all he finds are various perceptions rapidly succeeding each other. So the idea of self or soul cannot be traced back to an impression. It is, in fact, a fiction, Hume thinks, created by confusing small changes with no changes at all, and similarity with sameness. We are but a bundle of perceptions.
According to Hume, what is the origin of our ideas? How does this view serve him in his critique of what he calls "superstition"?
Compare Descartes and Hume on what can be known, and how it can be known.
Hume adopts Newton's motto, "frame no hypotheses," in order to
When Hume says that "all events seem entirely loose and separate," he means to imply that
In area after area, Hume is busy trying to convince us of the limitations of reason. Discuss how he goes about this with regard to causality, God, and morality.
Explain how Hume thinks the necessity of actions (that they have causes) is compatible with the fact of liberty in actions (that we sometimes act freely).
How does Hume explain our judgment that a certain action is bad or wrong or vicious? In what do we find the viciousness of a vicious action?
What kind of skepticism does Hume approve of? And what kind does he not approve of?
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)