Exam 19: David Hume: Unmasking the Pretensions of Reason
Does Kant agree or disagree with Hume's dictum that reason is the slave of the passions? Explain.
He disagrees. Reason, particularly in its form of the categorical imperative, can criticize and rule over inclinations or passions. As rational creatures, we are capable of acting according to the rule of reason.
What is a maxim? What is the test for morally acceptable maxims?
A maxim is the subjective principle on which we act. Universalization is the test for moral acceptability. The question is: Could everyone act according to this maxim? Unless the answer is yes, the maxim is unacceptable and acting according to it would be immoral.
Explain the famous Kantian dictum: "Thoughts without content are empty; intuitions without concepts are blind."
Knowledge, Kant believes, is limited to what we could possibly experience. The reason is that the elements of thought-concepts-have no content in themselves; they are just functions for operating on a content in some way (structuring it, organizing it, classifying it . . .). Without some content supplied by sensibility, concepts have nothing to operate on and are empty forms. On the other hand, if all we have is the sensory content of impressions, there is no knowledge either-just a booming, buzzing confusion. Intuitions (sensations, impressions) need the structuring of concepts to produce knowledge-indeed, even to produce the experience of an objective world!
You have borrowed $20 from an absent-minded friend. He has forgotten about it, and you are certain he will never remember. Moreover, your friend is well off and will never miss it; $20, however, means a lot to you.
Describe what considerations a Kantian would-and would not-urge you to consider in deciding whether to repay the debt.
What am I? Descartes, Hume, and Kant all discuss this question. Imagine that you are Immanuel Kant. Writing as you think he would write, discuss the views of Descartes and Hume on mind/self/soul, and express what you think is the truth about this matter.
Explain the idea of a synthetic a priori judgment, including both its semantic and its epistemological aspects. Why are these judgments puzzling?
What is will, according to Kant? What is a good will? What makes a good will good?
How does Kant's Copernican revolution address the problem of skepticism?
Descartes, Hume, and Kant all have something to say about whether human beings can be free in their actions. Describe what it is in the new science that makes this a pressing question, and then sketch the line that each takes on human freedom.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)